| Title |
DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abc6284 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jingyou Yu, Lisa H. Tostanoski, Lauren Peter, Noe B. Mercado, Katherine McMahan, Shant H. Mahrokhian, Joseph P. Nkolola, Jinyan Liu, Zhenfeng Li, Abishek Chandrashekar, David R. Martinez, Carolin Loos, Caroline Atyeo, Stephanie Fischinger, John S. Burke, Matthew D. Slein, Yuezhou Chen, Adam Zuiani, Felipe J. N. Lelis, Meghan Travers, Shaghayegh Habibi, Laurent Pessaint, Alex Van Ry, Kelvin Blade, Renita Brown, Anthony Cook, Brad Finneyfrock, Alan Dodson, Elyse Teow, Jason Velasco, Roland Zahn, Frank Wegmann, Esther A. Bondzie, Gabriel Dagotto, Makda S. Gebre, Xuan He, Catherine Jacob-Dolan, Marinela Kirilova, Nicole Kordana, Zijin Lin, Lori F. Maxfield, Felix Nampanya, Ramya Nityanandam, John D. Ventura, Huahua Wan, Yongfei Cai, Bing Chen, Aaron G. Schmidt, Duane R. Wesemann, Ralph S. Baric, Galit Alter, Hanne Andersen, Mark G. Lewis, Dan H. Barouch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,985 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 560 | 14% |
| Mexico | 328 | 8% |
| Spain | 237 | 6% |
| Argentina | 173 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 147 | 4% |
| Brazil | 93 | 2% |
| Colombia | 89 | 2% |
| Canada | 70 | 2% |
| India | 67 | 2% |
| Other | 411 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1810 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3372 | 85% |
| Scientists | 430 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 129 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 54 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 971 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 971 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 166 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 109 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 109 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 86 | 9% |
| Other | 62 | 6% |
| Other | 171 | 18% |
| Unknown | 268 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 151 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 127 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 28 | 3% |
| Other | 169 | 17% |
| Unknown | 303 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2999. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,231
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Science
#124
of 83,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182
of 425,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#10
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.