↓ Skip to main content

DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 68,423)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
441 Mendeley
Title
DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques
Published in
Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.abc6284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingyou Yu, Lisa H. Tostanoski, Lauren Peter, Noe B. Mercado, Katherine McMahan, Shant H. Mahrokhian, Joseph P. Nkolola, Jinyan Liu, Zhenfeng Li, Abishek Chandrashekar, David R. Martinez, Carolin Loos, Caroline Atyeo, Stephanie Fischinger, John S. Burke, Matthew D. Slein, Yuezhou Chen, Adam Zuiani, Felipe J. N. Lelis, Meghan Travers, Shaghayegh Habibi, Laurent Pessaint, Alex Van Ry, Kelvin Blade, Renita Brown, Anthony Cook, Brad Finneyfrock, Alan Dodson, Elyse Teow, Jason Velasco, Roland Zahn, Frank Wegmann, Esther A. Bondzie, Gabriel Dagotto, Makda S. Gebre, Xuan He, Catherine Jacob-Dolan, Marinela Kirilova, Nicole Kordana, Zijin Lin, Lori F. Maxfield, Felix Nampanya, Ramya Nityanandam, John D. Ventura, Huahua Wan, Yongfei Cai, Bing Chen, Aaron G. Schmidt, Duane R. Wesemann, Ralph S. Baric, Galit Alter, Hanne Andersen, Mark G. Lewis, Dan H. Barouch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,084 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 441 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 95 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Other 35 8%
Student > Master 32 7%
Other 92 21%
Unknown 79 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 67 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 10%
Chemistry 14 3%
Other 88 20%
Unknown 93 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3536. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#577
of 16,094,294 outputs
Outputs from Science
#39
of 68,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128
of 291,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#8
of 949 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 949 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.