↓ Skip to main content

Land crabs as key drivers in tropical coastal forest recruitment

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Land crabs as key drivers in tropical coastal forest recruitment
Published in
Biological Reviews, May 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00070.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin Stewart Lindquist, Ken W. Krauss, Peter T. Green, Dennis J. O’Dowd, Peter M. Sherman, Thomas J. Smith

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Colombia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 113 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Professor 12 9%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 57%
Environmental Science 33 26%
Unspecified 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 12 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#698,386
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#154
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,270
of 272,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.