@BidenHQ Fake studied were created and then retracted after real doctors demanded their data. FJB and every scumbag democrat supporter https://t.co/JakmkbzsXC
@samuelkullmann @atomicc0805 @RainerVoegtlin Studie: Hydroxychloroquin erhöht Sterblichkeitsrate bei covid: https://t.co/l0sH3K472P
@TheLancet How much deaths caused by this one, published by a once reputable institution ? Totally invented data. #Lancetgate https://t.co/AOy1cdz6dO
RT @DschlopesIsBack: Posted by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @ZelenkoZev on June 26th, 2021: The FDA betrayed the American people and 100000’s died…
@HallHurts : Why did @TheLancet RETRACT this HCQ ‘study’ in the spring of 2020 AND what impact did it have on the adoption of HCQ as a First Line Treatment for COVID-19 patients? @CartlandDavid https://t.co/qjFEV7ZgvT
@RealPatrickWebb @KingMakerFT @Nature @TheLancet Maybe this is why: how could they have published this????!!!!: https://t.co/xDERmYMeTy
@ColinDebunks After the fraud was laid bare, it turned out.. https://t.co/xmvm4RWuNu https://t.co/wa8Y3J6sLG
@redwondereroft1 @KIMMM107 @toobaffled Try the Hydroxychloroquine papers published in NEJM and Lancet and retracted almost immediately for starters. When those were first published was when I really knew something really really bad was going on. https:/
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @JikkyKjj: So who did? Who produced that huge amount of data - overnight - that [anons on the internet] proved to be fake? The answer i…
@texmed READ THE ROOM 👇
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
RT @Melchizedek1972: @MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the…
@MdBreathe How much of that was based on a fraudulent ( and retracted) multinational registry analysis put out by the Lancet? They used every trick in the book against HCQ. The result? More people needlessly died. https://t.co/UIDgvKDqGC https://t.co/is1
RT @DarkiFranky: ☑️ L'Hydroxychloroquine 🔴 L'étude @TheLancet rétractée https://t.co/0ulBrRcLXn
RT @DarkiFranky: ☑️ L'Hydroxychloroquine 🔴 L'étude @TheLancet rétractée https://t.co/0ulBrRcLXn
☑️ L'Hydroxychloroquine 🔴 L'étude @TheLancet rétractée https://t.co/0ulBrRcLXn
@Universal_Ken @Amy_Walker20 @LymeScience @MdBreathe @myedpillus I know some studies. Nobody trusts your data ( for good reason). https://t.co/UIDgvKDqGC https://t.co/mB7bmIqrP3
Well… well… well 👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾
@EthicalSkeptic Zero qc? Imo, no sir. Intentional obfuscation. Openly, gleefully captured. The first stink b0m b - how many retractions since then? Including the 2 Fauci relied on to make lockdown (or school closure?) recommendation? https://t.co/P4Q
@nypost This has to be a joke paper published by Lancet. Like this one previously. https://t.co/Q6b1pYw9rd https://t.co/8Zodocga4r
@i_iratus @LesleyJ62456075 @ABridgen Once upon a time a paper underwent many layers of peer review and once published in a major medical journal it was considered Gospel. Well let's have a look at the paper that was used to discredit Trump when he commente
@peppyland171717 Rédactrice de l'article ? Vous voyez son nom quelque part ? Et puis quel rapport avec la logopédie? 🤔 https://t.co/obhaQIwJ6S
RT @BradScott680760: @kischober @TheLancetInfDis The Lancet , you site the discredited, corrupt journal , that published a bogus HCQ study…
@PackCabrera @Drowlord101 @InternetH0F Let's start with this one https://t.co/JjgD3SXbaI
RT @MrCanuckle: @PlanetarySeed It wasn’t just swamp rats and Trump appointed Gottleib burying HCQ as an ionophore. Academia had the backs o…
@PlanetarySeed It wasn’t just swamp rats and Trump appointed Gottleib burying HCQ as an ionophore. Academia had the backs of Pharma at just the right time👇. Retracted now, but but then the damage was done and 💉mandates in place. #Surgisphere #SapanDesai ht
@bit3me3 @GreenoKingo @Hubrislefties @POTUS @GailWaldby YES! They published a fake study saying it was ineffective and harmful in May 2020 & media went nutts. Here’s what most ppl don’t know! That study was retracted when other scientists requested t
@JoelCarassio @MrHxC3 @AlexBer68702643 @lonnibesancon vous plaisantez j'espère ? aucune rétractée ?? mais le Lancet l'a retiré klk semaines plus tard, idem pour celle de Discovéry qui était bidonnée https://t.co/WyvBrturjF, comme disait une connaissance "
@AlastairMcA30 The Lancet , you site the discredited, corrupt journal , that published a bogus HCQ study based on factious data that had to be retracted with in weeks of release. The “study” was peer reviewed, which speaks volumes on the integrity of their