↓ Skip to main content

A probabilistic framework for improving reverse geocoding output

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions in GIS, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A probabilistic framework for improving reverse geocoding output
Published in
Transactions in GIS, May 2020
DOI 10.1111/tgis.12623
Authors

Zhengcong Yin, Daniel W. Goldberg, Tracy A. Hammond, Chong Zhang, Andong Ma, Xiao Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#12,469,419
of 15,692,207 outputs
Outputs from Transactions in GIS
#263
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,308
of 287,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions in GIS
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,692,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.