Trust the science? https://t.co/jSDP0jVyG6
@Red2mee @jessica12984373 @NashIsHereToo RETRACTED. BECAUSE IT WAS TOTALLY FUCKING MADE UP BULLSHIT. The same fucktards who call ivermectin horse paste. Clown. https://t.co/Mwd1sNvQhs
@stopvaccinating There was Lancet study “Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous” was retracted because study was flawed. I don’t abort Ivermectin but both drugs are anti parasitic that prevent false cancer diagnosis, so
We've detected a paper from Quality & Quantity that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/SHKKTJvPlU Retracted paper: https://t.co/69P34KfJiB
Um estudo robusto e recheado de inconsistências <https://t.co/uJofDeCC2v> NÃO havia na época como contestar, qdo não há medicamento específico, medicamos “fora da bula” autonomia do médico! 4 desestímulo à vacina. MENTIRA! Ele disse: “Aprovada pela #
@Michael69290057 @Drew40683012 @kksheld I feel bad responding to yet another bot. But here it goes. https://t.co/tVXc4z8ySf
@PoehsesReich @BananaJ69272853 @Karl_Lauterbach https://t.co/LEUaNh2YM6 die Studie ist zurück gezogen weis ich, mich interessiert aber warum mehr Menschen mit G6PD-Mangel gestorben sind. kann nicht nur an der hohen Dosis liegen.
@mkeulemans Beetje hetzelfde verhaal over een jaar? https://t.co/lgP1BgKuYp https://t.co/do1SszHTLw https://t.co/un6a2gtveK
@EthonRaptor @dtweiseth @ZackKepha @DLinkler @PeterHotez I remember this one paper being retracted as well. Did that mean that HCQ was safe because this paper was rejected? Not so fast bunny. We still have to see if this is just one brick removed or a key
Essa pesquisadora disse que há importantes artigos que atestam a eficácia da HCQ. Desdenha da eficácia da Coronavac. Queria saber a opinião de gente realmente qualificada sobre isso: @azavascki @AndersonBrito_ @mellziland @juliocroda @otavio_ranzani @dog
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
RT @lulafalcao: A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid…
A revista científica The Lancet publicou um robusto estudo que levou em conta o acompanhamento de 96 mil pacientes de Covid-19 submetidos à hidroxicloroquina. Resultado: não só é ineficaz contra o vírus, como aumenta o risco de morte e arritmias cardíacas
@CarlaZambelli38 @ottoalencar @dramayraoficial Zambelli: tá aí o estudo da Lancet que ela citou: https://t.co/XdVCW4hs15
@realfoodcures @GovWhitmer This is what a retracted article looks like. https://t.co/8KPqQZxuuN and it was only retracted because the authors were unable to access the raw data from the database to verify its validity
@DrKC4 @TCM_tweets @Bercmag @MFA_China @JPN_PMO @KremlinRussia_E @EU_Commission @_AfricanUnion @KingAbdullahII Allso, thats for leading me to that site. I found that retraction from The lancet on Hydroxychloroquine😀😁 ..that they tried to hide in the corn
@IndiaCapitalist @jsoorarez @concon2109 @cabojunioamaral Acabo de ler esse estudo aqui, que diz que, além de ineficaz, o santo remedinho pode ser perigoso (normal, todo remédio tem efeito colateral e é um dos motivos pelos quais não se pode toma-los sem re
hydroxychloroquine#. This study in the Lancet is still being quoted both in Canadian media and US media. It has been retracted. Why is the media still doing this. Doctors are saying it works on Covid and loosing their licences. Whats going on? link. https
@Rodrigo_Manga39 @mlkdudss @Mario21451 @AlanSouzaPinto @BolsonaroSP Foi sim! Já te mandei pesquisa publicada no The Lancet. https://t.co/rm2IoaCAE2
RT @LionCubPhD: And also on this other paper which was similarly retracted around the same time: https://t.co/gPCx1mwBnC It's hard not to…
And also on this other paper which was similarly retracted around the same time: https://t.co/gPCx1mwBnC It's hard not to blame this on malevolence.
Hmm, jurnal yg mengatakan kalo penggunaan HCQ untuk penanganan COVID-19 berbahaya, sudah dicabut https://t.co/c9pLFinpYa
@zegerdebyser Die hartproblemen met HCQ is toch gebaseerd op een artikel van de lancet dat ze teruggetrokken hebben wegens schandalig slecht? https://t.co/ZpS7g1xQGp
RT @TheLancet: “The findings...add to preliminary reports suggesting that regimens of chloroquine or #hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azi…
@charliebird49 Hydroxychloriquine got a lot of bad press earlier in pandemic due you this study. Most media outlets made hay but either failed to notice or failed to report its retraction. Dr Morrissey and many Irish docs having success w this safe 75yo t
Yup... https://t.co/fr5RO2Mb7L
@Nthn90 @baardvrouw @ArbiterOfTweets Retracted ... https://t.co/l6PG10asQ9
#timeline_HCQ_4_COVID_19 22 May 2020 RETRACTED: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous? https://t.co/TG3Upv4jSu
RT @jondesjardins1: @DrJacobsRad Aren't countries still using it to treat covid? There are so many conflicting studies out there Doc It was…
Good question!
RT @MagdalenaMilew7: @JamesTodaroMD https://t.co/xZiTbNvFKM 22 may article still exist.
@citizentvkenya @WaihigaMwaura Similarly, the paper "Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis" published in Lancet on 29th May (https://t.co/J9c5KlEWHi ) by the same authors
Je viens de tomber là-dessus. Le nom de Christian Funck-Brentano me rappelait quelque chose. Ajoutons au dossier déjà lourd: https://t.co/zcZ9DgtNun Il y a un niveau de ridicule qui devrait faire réfléchir les journalistes qui lui tendent encore le micro.
@Carol_Ryan_ Btw this one that the fake news was pushing..... retracted! https://t.co/NuTy8rYd49
@thejtlewis @realDonaldTrump You need to slow down on the #TrumpCult #KoolAid https://t.co/xazDPUg3E3
@PeopleOrPeoples @zev_dr @IngrahamAngle yeah, but the lancet still finds chloroquine/hydrochloroquine to be hazardous outside of hospitalization. https://t.co/CNCnzRqSea
@CzarinaHarris Indeed. Lancet pub'd a data-mining exploit, primarily to test "cardiac toxicity" of *chloroquine* in pts on "cardiac medications (angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and statins)". https://t.co/Uke
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous? - The Lancet @zones2surf https://t.co/iOPsVkUMYm
@Douglas78542465 @mattosop @amandamoraes500 @EduardoLeite_ @minsaude "Mesmo sem eficácia comprovada para Covid" Parabéns, tu é um analfabeto funcional. E olha a fonte que me da kkkkkk https://t.co/w9XHhF1g1r Enquanto eu te mostro a 'The Lancet' tu mostr
RT @_aLFRe_: Paper de Mehra et alii(ya retractado)sobre cardiotoxicidad d chloroquine e hydroxychloroquine está pub on-line el 22May https…
Paper de Mehra et alii(ya retractado)sobre cardiotoxicidad d chloroquine e hydroxychloroquine está pub on-line el 22May https://t.co/rWZPBKWt7s El "comment" entiéndase como "placet" d Christian Funck-Brentano y Jasoe-Elie Salem está 22May en @thelancet h
Avec le recul et ce qu’on sait de la publication du Lancet, certains devraient se mordre la langue, au lieu de continuer leur bashing.
RT @MagdalenaMilew7: @JamesTodaroMD https://t.co/xZiTbNvFKM 22 may article still exist.
@OlgaG58726484 It's still online: https://t.co/Dmm2y2GRNk
Poke @biobiobiobior @moon_bio @jadorelanight @Karl_Peter_Abel @medicalfollower @FAUREJEANPAUL5 @OSTERElizabeth1 Petit partage de ce fait intéressant juste au cas où vous ne l'auriez pas encore relevé.
@medicalfollower Et ça c'est pas splendide aussi ? https://t.co/FYDgtOu141
Poke @momotchiii @dperetti @aragon_jb @CorinneReverbel @ViolaineGuerin @france_soir @JeanYvesCAPO Ce timing est trop gros pour ne pas être suspect. Vous l'aviez peut-être déjà noté mais juste au cas où je vous le partage.
@ArtLeroux Je ne sais pas si vous aviez aussi relevé cet extraordinaire timing de l'article à charge des Pr Funck-Brentano et Salem de la #pitiesalpetriere https://t.co/eB84TTiXcw Analyser l'étude Mehra et publier cet article le même jour c'est magnifique
#LancetGate They are still referring to the fraud paper
RT @TheLancet: “The findings...add to preliminary reports suggesting that regimens of chloroquine or #hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azi…
Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: Why Might They be Hazardous? Read more here: https://t.co/7PjWZTYQdv
@Lukewearechange Are you SERIOUSLY still yammering on about Hydroxychloroquine? https://t.co/qOgGQy5EAx https://t.co/SFSjUxA075 https://t.co/YL7RU8jwHV https://t.co/Ehg84yyc6D
RT @TheLancet: “The findings...add to preliminary reports suggesting that regimens of chloroquine or #hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azi…
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous? https://t.co/WdpqhbcmGN
@drpaddymark @ADAlthousePhD @hswapnil @venkmurthy @ChadGonczyHPB @mikejohansenmd Agree. Leaving the issue of fabricating aside, is it an editorial hit? They chose to publish this comment the same date, https://t.co/3DSTxCR7zT "Mehra and colleagues should
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous? https://t.co/2wd8J71kuX
The Lancet 22May report: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous? https://t.co/3a5amo7Jmc
The findings from Mehra and colleagues' study add to preliminary reports suggesting that regimens of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azithromycin, are not useful and could be harmful in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. https://t.co/Zjs
Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin have sodium channel blocking properties that might contribute to proarrhythmia and heart failure in the context of myocardial injury and hypoxia present in COVID-19. This hypothesis remains to be tested.
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous? - The Lancet https://t.co/uzrNo0Ogrs
@AnibalVelarde @yankees11210 @Acosta Try Lancet then although I wouldn’t expect you to consider that as evidence either because it doesn’t fit your narrative does it 🤔🤷🏻♂️🙄. https://t.co/dUEEwfhICq
RT @walidgellad: Was reviewing the editorial accompanying the lancet hcq study. I'd like to find one pharmacoepidemiologist who would agre…
@Larhumato Pour rappel
RT @Larhumato: Plus clair, c’est difficile. Par l’auteur de l’éditorial écrit dans The Lancet à l’occasion de l’article qui a mis le feu a…
RT @walidgellad: Was reviewing the editorial accompanying the lancet hcq study. I'd like to find one pharmacoepidemiologist who would agre…
@wargonm @TheLancet Tu lis lentement 😂 https://t.co/TsuVFzks2X Cette analyse de l'étude Mehra n'a pas été aussi catégorique que l'OMS, le HCSP et le @gouvernementFR «Il est tentant …» de laisser le @gouvernementFR se débrouiller tout seul, et conseillé
Hidroxiclorochina a fost retras de catre OMS, din schema de tratament anti COVID-19,deoarece poate degenera tahicardie, aritmii cardiace severe ceea ce duce la moarte. https://t.co/0BFzvC7DIq
@ChrisBBacon3 Re: "Read it." Stop trolling. https://t.co/Yp235IVK5X https://t.co/FWbh6rj7en
RT @epigiri: Science at crossroads in managing #Covid-19: #HCQ Lancet: https://t.co/G8NIdLUChU Media: Dr who "debunked" HydroxyChloroqui…
RT @epigiri: Science at crossroads in managing #Covid-19: #HCQ Lancet: https://t.co/G8NIdLUChU Media: Dr who "debunked" HydroxyChloroqui…
@johnson_brandp @ShepKyred @LesHugTX @maxbaker_15 So SAD that you're so completely ignorant. https://t.co/vazmkt2yo8
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: why might they be hazardous? https://t.co/DDwVr9YOY3
REVISTA CIENTÍFICA "THE LANCET" PUBLICA ARTIGO SOBRE CLOROQUINA Cloroquina ou hidroxicloroquina para COVID-19: por que eles podem ser perigosos? https://t.co/rGFF26GJ8r
RT @incohetur: @libby_libstar @Normsmusic @Kim63727785 @charliekirk11 @jiddywoods @SecretService @Norsmusic You and Trump should stop pract…
@Doomsda03821380 @modernwoman13 @MattHancock Many related articles on this well respected site. https://t.co/w7Kz1gEg4U I'll rely on that thanks
@kwillkatz @webzweinullpe @atrupar I believe this is the study being referred to. https://t.co/aBioeTuOJq A quick scan of it shows: 1. not using zinc supplementation 2. Not being used prophylactically or in early onset, but in critically ill patients. T
¿Le comparten este artículo de @TheLancet al Mini Trump? Le vendría tantito bien citar y estudiar a expertos antes de decir cualquier otra estupidez sobre la hidroxicloroquina. https://t.co/qpdqvR1lW3
La cloroquina o la hidroxicloroquina, con o sin macrólido y la torsades de pointes 💢Christian Funck-Brentano prof. de medicina y farmacología clínica en la Sorbona 💢Joe Elie Salem Prof. Pitié Salpêtrière /Prog. Cardio-Oncología Sorbona #QuedateEnCasa htt