4,059 followers
@DuttonChemistry @dasingleton I'll raise you a rejection (after review) from PLoS One: https://t.co/N05VTth8UJ
4,059 followers
@klts0 I believe it was this paper https://t.co/N05VTth8UJ that was rejected from PLoS One because the 95% confidence interval didn't exclude no effect.
4,059 followers
@KevinDKohl This paper was rejected by @PLOSONE because our result wasn't statistically significant. Mind you, even having rough bounds on the magnitude of the effect we investigated would be an important result. https://t.co/Ax7U0ezCOv @mlipsitch