↓ Skip to main content

Improving Scientific Judgments in Law and Government: A Field Experiment of Patent Peer Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 253)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Scientific Judgments in Law and Government: A Field Experiment of Patent Peer Review
Published in
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, May 2020
DOI 10.1111/jels.12249
Authors

Daniel E. Ho, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,318,074
of 15,787,841 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
#41
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,538
of 289,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,787,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them