RT @steveruiz525: All you need to is ask the victims survivors ask yourself . another remdesivir denier not surprised but very disappointi…
Another denier the data is the proof
All you need to is ask the victims survivors ask yourself . another remdesivir denier not surprised but very disappointing
@steveruiz525 bullshit. bullshit. Show me your controlled trial where remdesivir harms anybody’s kidneys. Or where the death rate in the remdesivir arm is even larger than the placebo. https://t.co/XEVMiORM8N
@solflash @PolitikerenXXX @mariesimonsen Hva er det du forsøker å si? Alle land brukte respirator om det var tilgjengelig. Remdesivir har en viss betydning, men er ikke avgjørende https://t.co/7ZROZ8EURB
@DarkThayne @CitizenFreePres Why not prescribe it, if trials show that it works? https://t.co/BZXAaKGG8L
https://t.co/ypb7NeTPnz Fauci allowed mentally impaired patients unable to consent to receive the poison
@Somethi48848232 @ButHisEmails @racerlar29 @Doctor_Eric_B @JustRickinOhio @jewelz71RN @MattWallace888 Doctors use it to treat COVID patients because it works. https://t.co/EKk3RNenTj
@SinedWarrior Why is he a liar though? https://t.co/Z95MSWLXYt
@nozydog Less than were killed by not giving remdesivir? https://t.co/Z95MSWLXYt
@CitizenFreePres Why is he lying? https://t.co/Z95MSWLXYt
@dingodogruf @littleroundman @LLLovecat @unbridledmd Ebola has 50% mortality, so 53% mortality in a study without placebo arm tells you nothing about remdesivir. Other studies, including below, show Ebola killed these patients and not remdesivir. Morality
@BardiB09 @LLLovecat @unbridledmd Again crude TOTAL DEATHS are half as much under Remdesivir as placebo. It does work. https://t.co/ZaVZl6tvoG
Fellow #IDMedED with throwback #IDJournalClub 📖🧐. Small uptick in severe COVID-19 cases, time to remember the data. Why remdesivir, the population, the outcomes? 🙏 ACTT-1 and SOLIDARITY trials😷. https://t.co/ssCZ3cJfXw https://t.co/DxzHUEGwmN #IDTwitte
@PositiveInpact @CharlotteEmmaUK Remdesivir is a COVID treatment. It's not as effective as we first thought. https://t.co/8UqV8GcKDI But it certainly isnt great at "murder". Morphine and midazolam are symptom control, usually during palliative care. Hope
@rudeawaking2 @gary_graefen @PamelaHensley22 Who suppressed evidence? And if remdesivir is toxic why do RCTs dhow it decreases duration of hospital stays and COVID mortality? And why are critical care physicians still using it? https://t.co/R4JyG11s1z http
@Ilovefacts2 @patrick00846087 @Jakemil44083704 @Vicfreedom11 @delbigtree Remdesivir is not a great drug but clinical trials have consistently shown it reduces hospitalization and mortality in high risk COVID patients. Stop spreading misinformation. https:/
@LeeReevesTN @rhinopits @matthewloop @elonmusk And you point is? I typically get my medical information from peer-reviewed journals rather than magazine articles. Below are 3 trials confirming the efficacy of remdesivir against COVID. https://t.co/R4JyG11s
ベクルリーの市販後調査。 ACTT-1 Studyの結果と概ねトレンドは一緒だったということかな? 有害事象も、割と実感の範囲内。 https://t.co/NELBV4xDVP
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 — Final Report | NEJM https://t.co/rkOVzbCqTS
@LeeReevesTN @rhinopits @matthewloop @elonmusk Sure. This is the study used to support EUA for remdesivir. Now do the same for ivermectin as I requested 12 hours ago. https://t.co/R4JyG11s1z
@laymans_term1 @rt7683 @SabinehazanMD @jason_willz1 @honk_williams @GailSelf9 @Xx17965797N @SenRonJohnson The ACTT1 trial was completed in April 2020 and results published 11/20. Previous trials were underpowered to detect an effect. The ACTT1 trial was fu
@pennagal77 @BicknellAlf @thevivafrei @CBCNews @globalnews @CTVNews I guess the New England Journal of Medicine doesn’t know what they are talking about re Remdesivir? Pfffft, data? https://t.co/TQs1K3GtvN
@sjkrsjkr @ViperX83 @takenforawide @DelNumber1 @_____Wimpy This is laughable. Truly full-on science denial. https://t.co/7tejuk4XXc https://t.co/vK4GH1nwTh https://t.co/sgH0tkevIZ https://t.co/HuNxhLxyRh Yep, no evidence here!
@junias_n @DonnaGay8989 @joejpick @peaches1907 @2013_Sylvius @DrAseemMalhotra Because Remdesivir is an anti-viral drug which would be entirely logical to use against a virus,as opposed to a horse worming medication. There is also credible evidence of a ben
@MiddleAgeMike @ClareCraigPath 1. Remdesivir-safety=yes. https://t.co/5yJehYwUrL 2. Efficacy=yes. https://t.co/8UqV8GcKDI Though future studies showed less promising results. You'll not the same outcome measure as Activ-6 but 5 rather than 1 day improvemen
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report PMID: 32445440 https://t.co/awklsFZWs0
@rollie_woods @OccupyDemocrats The one I recall him recommending was Remdesivir which he took himself at Walter Reed. It's been proven to reduce viral infection & other symptoms and improve recovery time. https://t.co/VcwFdBDk1c
その場合、どちらかの群の95%信頼区間に、もう片方の群の点推定値が含まれるかどうかで評価することが多いと思います。
@TsugawaYusuke 本物の素人ですみません.教えていただけないでしょうか.このNEJMの論文に,差の95%CIとは別に治療群と対照群の95%CIが記載ありますが,下名はこれは母集団の区間推定と思っていました.どう解釈するのが正しいのでしょうか? https://t.co/WgcWY66PNk
@thereal_truther @RiverParrish1 @FLSurgeonGen @NebraskaMed The Infectious doctor who was overseeing me did not like that I refused it and printed out the below for me to read just to rebut me. I understand that medicines will work for some people, but I kn
@PampireRN @Immack3 @PennyWatrasDana @1therhino @StephenMosby @JamesMelville 6 month RCTS for vaccines - with very large cohorts. And great results. And Remdesivir was RECOVERY RCT https://t.co/o0qFMgTbDX
Day 19 #66DaysOfData - Read research paper on Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Not only they have used point estimate also they have provided confidence interval of the days of treatment by using remdesivir. - Great way to learn Data Analytics!
@WalahKerri @AngelaKwan4 @woodsmasher @AprilMarie710 found these in the New England Journal (IMO one of the best journals with regards to peer review and NOT publishing sh**! :D https://t.co/0kFBlp3wgh https://t.co/5KWjvsWP7U
@sarahleispag Our data show that remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. https://t.co/fkKDPBZZW2
@kuheana But your wife DID make it, so the Remdesivir saved her! The only damage done was to your ability to reason and deduce. What do them cotton pickin' doctors and perfessers in the hospitals know?!?!?!?! https://t.co/fkKDPBZZW2).
@ANGELOF73572889 Sure, this widow can trust what you say... NOT. You cannot even spell much less read the scientific literature. But yeah, you know let's treat a viral infection with an anti parasitic compound. https://t.co/foW8bglW8N
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 — Final Report | NEJM https://t.co/7uvm1DqaNb
@Badger_8_ @415GoldIsValue @ChuckCallesto Ivermectin does not work against Covid. Remdesivir does. https://t.co/Ai3SalsbL5
@ChuckCallesto 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦♀️🤡 remdesivir is proven to shorten the length of Covid infection/disease. https://t.co/Ai3SalsbL5
@dataOverFear1 @MattHancock https://t.co/8UqV8GcKDI This is the study the FDA and NICE based their recommendations at the time. In part in response to people claiming "we should give something". These are convincing results in a large scale study, replicat
@wef_suomi @paavola_lauri Miksi? Etkö osaa maksetusta artikkelista avata lähteitä? https://t.co/pXh7AwJ92b https://t.co/2c1z7LH4f6
@JimEschrich @theblaze He was wrong, as were lots of people about Remdesivir, even the original study found modest results. It does work better than Ivermectin, but both are only slightly better than doing nothing. https://t.co/ogrC7ldGDm
@TerryMc64 @papakim1 @TomFitton The new England journal of Medicine https://t.co/K8iy4y6o5m
@LynWard37383484 @RandPaul That’s not true and you could face repercussions (like @TwitterSupport) for spreading such misinformation. THIS is the trial. https://t.co/LEEpjp9Rnr
@kotosquito We have definitive studies. They demonstrate efficacy and safety. https://t.co/UXyyp9lgfd https://t.co/rJDMGY1nlM So you're wrong. And yes, that sounds paranoid. Steroids. Off label. Approved.
@195niv Empty vessel, ever heard of RCT? HCQ, Remdesvir has been shown to decrease length of hospitalisation (by few days) in clinical trials. But did not provided any significant mortality benefits, hence withdrawn. https://t.co/SlVVWYg99R. https://t.co/1
@FUatJackDorsey @Mozzer77120790 Some benefit, in specific populations. https://t.co/8UqV8GccOa And that article doesnt back up your 30% assertion.
@Ad_Richmond @lackeyleft @PeterHotez @JReinerMD @EricTopol Here is the journal article: https://t.co/ioP6Sj7Qg1
#COVID Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 — Final Report | NEJM https://t.co/fLADbeBrL2
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 — Final Report | NEJM https://t.co/le3uCi5365
@mhouse1149 @1noffensive @Rothbard1776 @libsoftiktok Yeah, and everyone who drank water also recovered. And ate carbs. They found out about it because of social media grifters which were then signal boosted by people who don't have any idea what the scien
@Alex15137013 @Erica6479 But you realise that those given this treatment were already seriously ill admitted to hospital with Covid-19? So yes quite a few of them would unfortunately die. Although WHO recommended its treatment of mild/moderate cases, not h
@syctong @DrToddLee Case by case but usually no. Time from symptom onset important - sooner better and use of CPAP to some point dependent on physiological reserve. Wasn't useful in ACTT-1: https://t.co/yqjvSaWn6l https://t.co/v941JNQXjZ
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
@JosieJoBee @carver_lady @barbiehines @Michelle4Griff This is not the same thing as saying that Remdesivir is associated with worse outcomes. It isn't. https://t.co/q4SkP4tE2V. https://t.co/FvP0KFqJpb
RT @DrAndreKalil: #Remdesivir new trial just published Here are the clinical implications: Canadian trial (CATCO) in hospitalized patients…
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
RT @davidlye70: For over a year WHO has said remdesivir has no benefit in COVID. Now final Solidarity consistent with ACTT-1. How many LMIC…
RT @davidlye70: For over a year WHO has said remdesivir has no benefit in COVID. Now final Solidarity consistent with ACTT-1. How many LMIC…
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
RT @davidlye70: For over a year WHO has said remdesivir has no benefit in COVID. Now final Solidarity consistent with ACTT-1. How many LMIC…
Science!
RT @DrAndreKalil: #Remdesivir new trial just published Here are the clinical implications: Canadian trial (CATCO) in hospitalized patients…
RT @DrAndreKalil: #Remdesivir new trial just published Here are the clinical implications: Canadian trial (CATCO) in hospitalized patients…
RT @davidlye70: For over a year WHO has said remdesivir has no benefit in COVID. Now final Solidarity consistent with ACTT-1. How many LMIC…
For over a year WHO has said remdesivir has no benefit in COVID. Now final Solidarity consistent with ACTT-1. How many LMIC patients suffered based on WHO COVID treatment guideline?
RT @DrAndreKalil: 🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0…
🆕SOLIDARITY RCT N=8275 https://t.co/BE60GRz0RJ #Remdesivir vs SOC w-w/o O2 ↓↓Progression to Death/Ventilation➡️RR=0.84(0.75-0.93)P=0.001 ↓↓Death➡️RR=0.86(0.76-0.98)P=0.02 Remdesivir➡️proven↓↓death in hospitalized pts #COVID19 in both double-blind&open
@Horsewithnona11 I do not know where you found the 53% death rate. The data used for the FDA's EUA is in the attached publication. Remdesivir reduced all-cause mortality by 20%. https://t.co/R4JyG11s1z
@joelapen71 @P_McCulloughMD Very glad your dad is back home recuperating. And also that he had side effects, namely hallucinations. It would be an uncommon one, <5% from reports - https://t.co/BJg7d4fZAW. The key is that your Dad is doing well at home.
@PeterStepped @P_McCulloughMD Tell me, what are your professional qualifications exactly? And if you even opened the article, the very first line cites additional studies for hospitalized patients - https://t.co/BJg7d4fZAW
@CTVNews In case someone needs more information! The data was released since 2020. https://t.co/9dTnoMJGnl