↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale Flow Experiments for Managing River Systems

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale Flow Experiments for Managing River Systems
Published in
BioScience, December 2011
DOI 10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.5
Authors

Christopher P. Konrad, Julian D. Olden, David A. Lytle, Theodore S. Melis, John C. Schmidt, Erin N. Bray, Mary C. Freeman, Keith B. Gido, Nina P. Hemphill, Mark J. Kennard, Laura E. McMullen, Meryl C. Mims, Mark Pyron, Christopher T. Robinson, John G. Williams

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 6%
Canada 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 151 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 19%
Student > Master 32 19%
Other 12 7%
Unspecified 11 7%
Other 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 70 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 29%
Unspecified 22 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 10%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 6 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,005,600
of 13,444,619 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,161
of 2,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,617
of 266,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,444,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.