↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous fluid therapy in the perioperative and critical care setting: Executive summary of the International Fluid Academy (IFA)

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 708)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
95 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravenous fluid therapy in the perioperative and critical care setting: Executive summary of the International Fluid Academy (IFA)
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00679-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Thomas Langer, Djillali Annane, Luciano Gattinoni, Paul Elbers, Robert G. Hahn, Inneke De laet, Andrea Minini, Adrian Wong, Can Ince, David Muckart, Monty Mythen, Pietro Caironi, Niels Van Regenmortel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#339,340
of 15,916,110 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#20
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,970
of 291,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,916,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them