You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maintenance of Wintertime Vitamin D Status with Cholecalciferol Supplementation Is Not Associated with Alterations in Serum Cytokine Concentrations among Apparently Healthy Younger or Older Adults 1–4
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nutrition, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3945/jn.110.131516 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria S. Barnes, Geraldine Horigan, Kevin D. Cashman, Tom R. Hill, L. Kirsty Forsythe, Alice J. Lucey, Emeir M. McSorley, Mairead Kiely, Maxine P. Bonham, Pamela J. Magee, J.J. Strain, Julie M.W. Wallace |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 27% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#8,902
of 9,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,009
of 194,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#45
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.