↓ Skip to main content

The (in)credibility of algorithmic models to non-experts

Overview of attention for article published in Information, Communication & Society, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 1,251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
141 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
The (in)credibility of algorithmic models to non-experts
Published in
Information, Communication & Society, May 2020
DOI 10.1080/1369118x.2020.1761860
Authors

Daan Kolkman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 32%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 41%
Computer Science 6 18%
Design 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#212,399
of 16,650,962 outputs
Outputs from Information, Communication & Society
#23
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,292
of 290,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information, Communication & Society
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,650,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.