↓ Skip to main content

Colony-stimulating factors for prevention and treatment of infectious complications in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colony-stimulating factors for prevention and treatment of infectious complications in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008238.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronit Gurion, Yulia Belnik-Plitman, Anat Gafter-Gvili, Mical Paul, Liat Vidal, Isaac Ben-Bassat, Ofer Shpilberg, Pia Raanani

Abstract

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is a fatal bone marrow cancer. Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) are frequently administered during and after chemotherapy to reduce complications. However, their safety with regard to disease-related outcomes and survival in AML is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of CSFs on patient outcomes, including survival.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Other 8 13%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 17 27%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Unspecified 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,288,636
of 12,923,198 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,147
of 10,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,460
of 120,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,923,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.