You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12866-020-01819-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca Romana Cianfanelli, Olivier Cunrath, Dirk Bumann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 33% |
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 15 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 35% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,255,912
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#135
of 3,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,313
of 397,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#6
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,452 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.