↓ Skip to main content

Wearables for something good: aid, dataveillance and the production of children’s digital bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Information, Communication & Society, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Wearables for something good: aid, dataveillance and the production of children’s digital bodies
Published in
Information, Communication & Society, May 2020
DOI 10.1080/1369118x.2020.1753797
Authors

Kristin Bergtora Sandvik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,841,846
of 15,576,177 outputs
Outputs from Information, Communication & Society
#361
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,579
of 284,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information, Communication & Society
#16
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,576,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.