The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
An empiricist's guide to modern coexistence theory for competitive communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oikos, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/oik.06957 |
| Authors |
Casey M. Godwin, Feng‐Hsun Chang, Bradley J. Cardinale |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 22% |
| Brazil | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 26 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 24 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 23% |
| Researcher | 31 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,481,444
of 26,749,913 outputs
Outputs from Oikos
#160
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,968
of 438,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oikos
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,749,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.