You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low stand density moderates growth declines during hot droughts in semi‐arid forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13615 |
| Authors |
Caitlin M. Andrews, Anthony W. D'Amato, Shawn Fraver, Brian Palik, Michael A. Battaglia, John B. Bradford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,944,842
of 24,594,795 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,693
of 3,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,218
of 393,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#66
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,594,795 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.