↓ Skip to main content

Retroactive Liability in China's Soil Pollution Law: Lessons from Theoretical and Comparative Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Transnational Environmental Law, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
Retroactive Liability in China's Soil Pollution Law: Lessons from Theoretical and Comparative Analysis
Published in
Transnational Environmental Law, May 2020
DOI 10.1017/s2047102520000011
Authors

Huanhuan Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,912,709
of 15,398,963 outputs
Outputs from Transnational Environmental Law
#116
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,386
of 253,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transnational Environmental Law
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,398,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them