↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical and methodological considerations in evaluating large-scale health information technology change programmes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Theoretical and methodological considerations in evaluating large-scale health information technology change programmes
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05355-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrin Cresswell, Aziz Sheikh, Bryony Dean Franklin, Marta Krasuska, Hung The Nguyen, Susan Hinder, Wendy Lane, Hajar Mozaffar, Kathy Mason, Sally Eason, Henry W. W. Potts, Robin Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 43%
Other 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 21%
Computer Science 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,625,171
of 15,968,624 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#709
of 5,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,534
of 292,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,968,624 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them