↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Domestic Change and Continuity in North Korea

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies Review, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 380)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
Title
Assessing Domestic Change and Continuity in North Korea
Published in
Asian Studies Review, May 2020
DOI 10.1080/10357823.2020.1763255
Authors

Andrew Yeo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,072,890
of 15,364,275 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#15
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,968
of 235,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,364,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them