You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012616.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jia Yee Mah, Suet Wan Choy, Matthew A Roberts, Anne Marie Desai, Melissa Corken, Stella M Gwini, Lawrence P McMahon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 3 | 27% |
| South Africa | 2 | 18% |
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 92 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 92 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,554,188
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,138
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,166
of 419,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.