↓ Skip to main content

Oral protein-based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral protein-based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012616.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Yee Mah, Suet Wan Choy, Matthew A Roberts, Anne Marie Desai, Melissa Corken, Stella M Gwini, Lawrence P McMahon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,481,510
of 15,422,362 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,740
of 11,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,855
of 261,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,422,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.