You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012284.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chin Fang Ngim, Nai Ming Lai, Janet YH Hong, Shir Ley Tan, Amutha Ramadas, Premala Muthukumarasamy, Meow-Keong Thong |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 219 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 39 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 80 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 40 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 84 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,447,072
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,232
of 12,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,550
of 396,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.