You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deepest Photographic Evidence of an Abyssal Cephalopod
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 1971
|
| DOI | 10.1038/232487b0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. JAHN |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 67% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,190,068
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#33,554
of 91,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37
of 3,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#5
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.