↓ Skip to main content

Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: A review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part I, anatomic leg-length inequality: prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical…

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: A review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part I, anatomic leg-length inequality: prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, July 2005
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-13-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary A Knutson

Abstract

Leg-length inequality is most often divided into two groups: anatomic and functional. Part I of this review analyses data collected on anatomic leg-length inequality relative to prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance. Part II examines the functional "short leg" including anatomic-functional relationships, and provides an outline for clinical decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 307 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 19%
Student > Master 51 16%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 21 7%
Other 72 23%
Unknown 62 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 12%
Sports and Recreations 31 10%
Engineering 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 72 23%