↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Osteopathy, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Chiropractic & Osteopathy, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-13-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary A Knutson

Abstract

Leg-length inequality is most often divided into two groups: anatomic and functional. Part I of this review analyses data collected on anatomic leg-length inequality relative to prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance. Part II examines the functional "short leg" including anatomic-functional relationships, and provides an outline for clinical decision-making.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 195 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 40 20%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 17 8%
Other 55 27%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 48%
Sports and Recreations 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Engineering 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 23 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,336,233
of 14,684,767 outputs
Outputs from Chiropractic & Osteopathy
#21
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,912
of 123,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chiropractic & Osteopathy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,684,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them