↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Osteopathy, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Chiropractic & Osteopathy, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-13-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary A Knutson

Abstract

Leg-length inequality is most often divided into two groups: anatomic and functional. Part I of this review analyses data collected on anatomic leg-length inequality relative to prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance. Part II examines the functional "short leg" including anatomic-functional relationships, and provides an outline for clinical decision-making.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 21%
Student > Master 37 20%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 61 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 48%
Sports and Recreations 23 13%
Unspecified 21 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Engineering 11 6%
Other 20 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,197,692
of 13,534,432 outputs
Outputs from Chiropractic & Osteopathy
#19
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,679
of 121,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chiropractic & Osteopathy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,534,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them