↓ Skip to main content

Generalized non-reflecting boundaries for fluid re-simulation

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Generalized non-reflecting boundaries for fluid re-simulation
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925963
Authors

Morten Bojsen-Hansen, Chris Wojtan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,279,076
of 15,377,568 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#289
of 1,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,115
of 239,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,377,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.