↓ Skip to main content

Wild data: how front‐line hospital staff make sense of patients’ experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Health & Illness, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 1,526)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
85 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wild data: how front‐line hospital staff make sense of patients’ experiences
Published in
Sociology of Health & Illness, May 2020
DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.13115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Montgomery, Alison Chisholm, Stephen Parkin, Louise Locock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#392,409
of 15,315,383 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#33
of 1,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,276
of 208,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,315,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.