You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Environmental factors influencing tick densities over seven years in a French suburban forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13071-016-1591-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard E. L. Paul, Martine Cote, Evelyne Le Naour, Sarah I. Bonnet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Norway | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 25% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 16 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,695,810
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,764
of 6,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,232
of 357,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#79
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.