You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unraveling tumor–immune heterogeneity in advanced ovarian cancer uncovers immunogenic effect of chemotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-020-0630-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandro Jiménez-Sánchez, Paulina Cybulska, Katherine LaVigne Mager, Simon Koplev, Oliver Cast, Dominique-Laurent Couturier, Danish Memon, Pier Selenica, Ines Nikolovski, Yousef Mazaheri, Yonina Bykov, Felipe C. Geyer, Geoff Macintyre, Lena Morrill Gavarró, Ruben M. Drews, Michael B. Gill, Anastasios D. Papanastasiou, Ramon E. Sosa, Robert A. Soslow, Tyler Walther, Ronglai Shen, Dennis S. Chi, Kay J. Park, Travis Hollmann, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Florian Markowetz, Pedro Beltrao, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Dmitriy Zamarin, James D. Brenton, Alexandra Snyder, Britta Weigelt, Evis Sala, Martin L. Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 15% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Iraq | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 69% |
| Scientists | 14 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 60 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 71 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#826,573
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,518
of 7,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,720
of 404,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#25
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.