Old jack pushing “mask science”
@NicoleW87910681 @LauraServetnyk It appears you’re either very bad at research or don’t really want to learn. The first study you posted was retracted. And the other study was addressed in the original source I posted. All that to say that there is still n
@futurasciences S'il vous plaît indiquez que l'étude en question a été retirée https://t.co/A0jY3ro6IY https://t.co/IMDKh9I08Z
@Lie_no_more @UlrichJacob2 @DrPuerner Studien zeigen, Masken helfen nicht gegen Viren: https://t.co/v5uFLms72d https://t.co/Wp7lINmYMK https://t.co/CLHi49v0wP Selbst die BAG Schweiz hält Masken nur bei aktivem Husten für nötig: https://t.co/buhBH1THlp Mask
@BambinoJalapeno @OmarAlghabra The study was retracted due to faulty measurements and misleading interpretation of the authors. https://t.co/CKWz7lw77Z
@kermit77554093 @AlexMunter STOP REPEATING OLD NEWS. This article has been retracted. "The author's interpretation of their results was misleading" https://t.co/QjWfNuiV4s July 7, 2020
@henayuanxiang11 @ChatswoodPamela @10NewsFirstAdl @alpsa This article has been retracted https://t.co/nZDB5vxq1d
@clintrarey @sparkyandalert @BrandiKruse Here is their retraction. https://t.co/tEgqcuVT7c
Notice of Retraction: Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/9w7XUwpODl
@ChrisRingele @trishgreenhalgh There is no supporting evidence for this statement given in this 18 month old study - of the 2 citations given later, the first claiming masks do not prevent covid transmission was RETRACTED https://t.co/0kI4FDcOoM and the se
@Rombicub @MartinCJanssen Anmerkung der Redaktion Der Artikel in den Annals of Internal Medicine wurde zurückgezogen, siehe die Anmerkung der Zeitschrift https://t.co/tH329hPPpm
@EinfachLiebe1 @K_MaKoTa @MoGin2k19 @KathaSchulze Ne alte Studie vom April 2020, die von den Wissenschaftlern selber wegen Fehlern zurückgezogen wurde Läuft bei dir. Sonst noch was zum lächerlich machen? https://t.co/yqbqFkIOnA https://t.co/3DAdffQNpb
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You're SFS. The ONLY RCT to test mask-wearing’s specific effectiveness against Covid-19 was a 2020 study by Bundgaard, in Denmark. This large (4,862 participants) RCT divided people between a mask-wearing group (providing “high-quality” three-la
@Likeshesays True. But that research was retracted, because they had a faulty analysis. These things happen, and smart people take note. https://t.co/rNdPjB6PC1
@alkcheet @GoslingPeters @Redbull796 @DanPaulman @deanhoadley @DrFrancesRyan And another showing masks were ineffective and subsequent retraction due to faulty data.https://t.co/RxSJdnmLv6 https://t.co/HjLNhfqvju
@MarkChangizi @Jon77Ho @BrentJeffcoat @GDukHV @IamRobKemp @Dropdead368 @leeleebobs That study was RETRACTED. The Lancet is gold standard research. https://t.co/u6PxkMDbGR https://t.co/Z318FAzYlZ
@peaceandhvac @Serenity3_18 @DianeMcCallum1 @OregonGovBrown You do realize the article starts off by saying "This article has been retracted." Here's the notice of retraction: https://t.co/HYfB9h7gz2
RT @PoehsesReich: @Emily_Burns_V https://t.co/jBzHRflSmk https://t.co/5QrOpACFF0 One can only wonder why a really clean RCT, like that of…
RT @PoehsesReich: @Emily_Burns_V https://t.co/jBzHRflSmk https://t.co/5QrOpACFF0 One can only wonder why a really clean RCT, like that of…
RT @PoehsesReich: @Emily_Burns_V https://t.co/jBzHRflSmk https://t.co/5QrOpACFF0 One can only wonder why a really clean RCT, like that of…
RT @PoehsesReich: @Emily_Burns_V https://t.co/jBzHRflSmk https://t.co/5QrOpACFF0 One can only wonder why a really clean RCT, like that of…
RT @PoehsesReich: @DrChristianWin1 @BentFreiwald Maskentragen ist KEINE Kindesmisshandlung? Ernsthaft? -> Quizfrage: Wo sind die RCT, die ü…
RT @C_Siemering: @vanRicky @Susanne45217800 Ernsthaft? Sie argumentieren mit einem Ärzteblatt- Bericht über eine Studie, die längst VON DEN…
@vanRicky @Susanne45217800 Ernsthaft? Sie argumentieren mit einem Ärzteblatt- Bericht über eine Studie, die längst VON DEN AUTOREN SELBST zurückgezogen wurde, da die Ergebnisse schlicht nicht interpretierbar waren? https://t.co/ssATxfAaei
@SpiresCMG @udontgetaccess1 @freep Notice of Retraction of the posted article https://t.co/FnyUscgoXR
@josh_mcwhirter @jonj77 @ClayTravis @jaydugan Same masks that has been used for 100 years in surgery rooms? Those masks are not as effective as N95 but they do help, articles saying otherwise have retracted their misleading statements: https://t.co/zQbKYsr
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
@Harty_Brian The retraction was July 7th by the Chinese authors of the reseatch letter saying they will republish later with better study methods. What is fishy about that? Numbers aren't numbers if the methodology is bad. https://t.co/Diw8zu1Ucn https:
In Arkansas, retracted papers (this one for being very misleading) at a legislative hearing are considered "acceptable scholarship." Sigh.
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
RT @arkepi2020: The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
The paper she's referencing has been retracted. https://t.co/fbadEGVfec https://t.co/pGqnC8Jpm5
@_Zyss_ @Elscribo1 @Sarosh51793433 @AnnastaciaMP How carefully did you read that article? Cos there’s a big notice at the top saying it was retracted. 😂😂😂 https://t.co/O9YnTa5epF Here’s a more recent article, from The Lancet which might interest you if y
RT @altonrus: @GregBryk @DFisman @Roman_Baber @Milhouse_Van_Ho There were two high profile papers suggesting masks could be harmful, but bo…
@GregBryk @DFisman @Roman_Baber @Milhouse_Van_Ho There were two high profile papers suggesting masks could be harmful, but both have since been retracted. https://t.co/74cPCS8Fur https://t.co/rqoTyurpzc
@IuppiterC @OkMatar Maybe it is you who should study more: https://t.co/P1oyvjgXVb that paper has been retracted…
@mostsuggested @nytimesworld @SadiqKhan https://t.co/yJBwnmPcd1 It appears you need to do better research.
RT @stevenmosher: katz relies on retracted science https://t.co/pImWBegUNx https://t.co/kOz59HkPHQ
@mclovingeet and here's another bit about it! (https://t.co/vTiCtt59gO) https://t.co/DVeSvEKE6l
@JulesGuitar @ShayCormac_1 @ArneChristensen @tlowdon @jhaskinscabrera Did you miss this part accidentally or on purpose? I'm truly curious. This is the way science works. People write a paper and other challenge the paper if they find errors.. https://t.c
@68inchesNugly @mhdksafa The first fucking thing says that the article has been retracted, decided to screenshot why, but here's a link to the notice of retraction that was provided in the same article you just sent https://t.co/jFvnArbZOi https://t.co/Tas
@ez_1978_ @Rob_Ruadh Retracted. https://t.co/1MiSK3aYP6
@Kaltmamsell1 @Coliban @tanztihrnarren @NellHitchens @aya_velazquez @DB_Bahn Ich Versuche es auch Mal mit Bildern und dem Statement des Journals: https://t.co/EJBAL4Ilwg https://t.co/Rind253NuY
@L0rava @AkisAkkep @pirijanne @RiikkaLassila @SaneEpi Sen lisäksi, on olemassa pitkä liuta erilaisia tutkimuksia, joissa on alunperin päädytty siihen, että maskeista on hyötyä, jotka on sittemmin vedetty takaisin tai korjattu niin että ko hyötyä ei voida e
Relevant context: the paper advertised by Dr. #Köhnlein at 1h13m49s of v=u68bTWYY2UI was retracted, too (apparently after pressure from the editors): https://t.co/Sumgz9xwF3("According to recommendations by the editors of #AnnalsOfInternalMedicine, we are
@realChuckGraham @ChassCosmetics @tatereeves Did you even bother reading the article?? It’s been retracted because, guess what? ! Cloth masks reduces viral emission by 80% & surgical masks by 27% .. 🧐 In case you didn’t realise, viruses live in drop
@CExoriri @Mattie515 @sfawcett @TheRealHoarse https://t.co/DXwp2TVpvL And that was just a random pull. But I guess keeping up with actual science doesn't fit with your narrative.
@NeoCortexDeluxe @leonore_sacha Nur auf ein Bsp möchte ich gerne eingehen, das direkt auf Masken und Covid Bezug nimmt. Folgt man dem Link stellt man fest: dieser Artikel wurde aufgrund eines methodischen Fehlers inzwischen zurückgerufen, der die Ergebnis
A "study" (n = 4) that actually showed cotton masks reduce transmission, wrongly concluded it didn't, and was retracted from the BMJ. 1/2 https://t.co/6XA1cmWUL9
@BruhCasual @ogg23 @PrisonPlanet uh right at the top of that article it redirects to: https://t.co/edvKOr4iCS "Notice of Retraction: Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2"
First Study — RETRACTED. Second Study — Misrepresented. https://t.co/aSQLyoMDJk https://t.co/y050tT1yzp https://t.co/WXn25Nokrt https://t.co/oDhq0nF90f
4/? DOI 10.7326/M20-1342 - this paper was retracted by the authors https://t.co/mvXgYsBgmU
@GRHutchinson Retraction notice here: https://t.co/xGNLqQvSGR The authors wanted to correct the paper but the journal wouldn't let them. "We proposed correcting the reported data with new experimental data from additional patients, but the editors reque
@TheProffittier @ShaneTHazel Jeez.....The First linked on clicked on has "This article has been retracted" at the very top. Why? https://t.co/sIgL8rcIfW
@rjblacktx @zforhelives @Supesmin @JournosPostLs https://t.co/cAJNj9MU1A (And that study didn't say what you think it said anyway, and had an n size of fucking 4.)
@BlowVal @StevenKaplan68 @JoshManMode No, it's not. Masks don't help much anyway: https://t.co/deHYTS6p2s https://t.co/tgNk87CR0Y https://t.co/oj9PGhww2G But that wasn't even my point; we shouldn't force anyone to wear one against their will. If you don
@JTaylor5432 @jay89898989 @FergalBowers Firstly James I asked your boyfriend Jay & secondly I think this is the biggest self own I’ve ever seen on Twitter! Did you even read the mask study after you panic googled it?? Retracted!! You are pathetic http
@William95147321 @immunosummo @BeckyJohnson222 @Craig_A_Spencer This was retracted https://t.co/6FtyMY3QMw
@jjcromag Has the Annals of Internal Medicine ever published a scientific article that they didn't have to later retract due to poor data, undisclosed funding or just overall bad science? https://t.co/aWO0e8gpci https://t.co/e98D51GZBF https://t.co/9u9Gzxp
@Sam95217933 @wheeliemum @SalimAbaza @ProfitProphet9 @g3nt13m4n @realDonaldTrump @nypost @TuckerCarlson It's a podcast, here https://t.co/MKR32a8WGD https://t.co/ubCy01TO0O Here's one retracting those studies (done on 4 patients)
@navyblueeye @BlondJedi Ich wusste, dass das jetzt kommt😅 Zur Info, dieser wissenschaftliche Artikel wurde zurückgerufen... https://t.co/kS43GrTxC8
@SensitiveNomad @Frankie16852218 @CulkinAndrew @JennaEllisEsq Did you see the part about how the study that article was based on has since been retracted? Here's the retraction notice- https://t.co/Zw4yXE3IOi
@AlexBerenson So we've sunk to making studies that show masks don't work retract their due social pressure. https://t.co/xUmgUruE2c
@schuuuuuler @SunsetSoFresh I did my homework and the first and only article I checked, 3rd one down in the left column from the annals of internal medicine, was retracted https://t.co/Kjc2ewGCWo you may want to do your ‘homework’ before posting unverified
@sylt33 @BahnkundenV @ECHOSKUNST1 @DB_Bahn Anmerkung der Redaktion (Ärzteblatt): Der Artikel in den Annals of Internal Medicine wurde zurückgezogen, siehe die Anmerkung der Zeitschrift https://t.co/RVXjsynqSJ
lmaoooo
@bereginya33 @TimothySanfor18 @jeremyrhammond I think the article you're referring to was retracted: https://t.co/7RdxSM4zXu
@Amina_Semlali @apoorva_nyc @mikeives Ignore the mask section because the 2 references they base it on are (92) cited misleadingly (see fig 1 at https://t.co/gdwPcsufeM) and (170) has been retracted (https://t.co/lWGN2lWOMc)
@BillSpadea https://t.co/kxtGTmbtPd here is just one of the retractions from the absurd studies you post.
@JamesTodaroMD @BillSpadea So irresponsible...talk about fear mongering. There is a notice of retraction on this study. https://t.co/kxtGTmbtPd
@MartinTriker @fgemein @sixtus Weiter im Text. Quelle 170 wurde zurückgezogen, weil die Ergebnisse unter der Nachweisgrenze der Methode waren und daher eigentlich nur Rauschen. Retraction notice: https://t.co/lWGN2lFdnC https://t.co/rOYQaXqfkF
@petecc5 @GovNedLamont @SRuhle @MSNBC You lemmings. You’re citing a study from April 2020 thats was retracted for being “misleading and endangering public health by obfuscating important degrees of efficacy.” https://t.co/PnfNOk7tzi
@BrucknerHartwin @claudia86242254 @Frau_Katzenblum @Volksverpetzer Anmerkung der Redaktion Der Artikel in den Annals of Internal Medicine wurde zurückgezogen, siehe die Anmerkung der Zeitschrift https://t.co/ciZSxi7z9v Ist in deinem Link zu lesen.
@AnikiSmashFSP Mask don’t stop a virus https://t.co/kmEj5mChNG
@padresj The bigger issue here is that there scientific debate over the types of mask. Additionally, the lockdowns in California have not slowed the spread of the pandemic, so she's simply echoing whata many feel. As for me, I've of the mind leave it to th
@DeniselxN @andyhre @MichaelSkolnik @harrisonmarkey According to recommendations by the editors of Annals of Internal Medicine, we are retracting our article, “Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2. A Controlled Comparison in 4
RT @CT_Bergstrom: Remember that paper that said masks don't work because if you cough through them on a petri dish, some viral RNA gets thr…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: Remember that paper that said masks don't work because if you cough through them on a petri dish, some viral RNA gets thr…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: Remember that paper that said masks don't work because if you cough through them on a petri dish, some viral RNA gets thr…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: Remember that paper that said masks don't work because if you cough through them on a petri dish, some viral RNA gets thr…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: Remember that paper that said masks don't work because if you cough through them on a petri dish, some viral RNA gets thr…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: Remember that paper that said masks don't work because if you cough through them on a petri dish, some viral RNA gets thr…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: Remember that paper that said masks don't work because if you cough through them on a petri dish, some viral RNA gets thr…