| Title |
Guidelines for communicating about bats to prevent persecution in the time of COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Douglas MacFarlane, Ricardo Rocha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 352 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 9% |
| Spain | 10 | 3% |
| Australia | 10 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 10 | 3% |
| Portugal | 9 | 3% |
| Finland | 6 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 66 | 19% |
| Unknown | 162 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 234 | 66% |
| Scientists | 106 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 269 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 70 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 22% |
| Unknown | 77 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 282. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#127,783
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#76
of 6,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,574
of 434,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#2
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.