RT @MORUBKK: Interesting: New results from Rajasingham et al in combination with the other randomised trials, provides suggestive evidence…
@MoreMusic123 @MsMoxyNYC @RandPaul this took 20 seconds to find. https://t.co/rBBSzYz0Rc
RT @Covid19Crusher: Quick meta-analysis of the 3 underpowered randomized hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis already borders statistical signifi…
RT @MORUBKK: Interesting: New results from Rajasingham et al in combination with the other randomised trials, provides suggestive evidence…
RT @MORUBKK: Interesting: New results from Rajasingham et al in combination with the other randomised trials, provides suggestive evidence…
@alisonkara @SkyNewsAust @CraigKellyMP HCQ does not work as prophylaxis or treatment. Postexposure prophylaxis https://t.co/lsYJR3mmGQ Mild to moderate disease https://t.co/rD0iekkOg4 mild disease https://t.co/mC8GBcfsxG Overview https://t.co/gefmUP4Fmt
RT @joex92_: Les essais randomisés en prophylaxie montrent que HCQ marche aussi en prophylaxie (post ou pre-exposition) https://t.co/8odtAj…
Trials on HCQ shows + results
RT @MORUBKK: Interesting: New results from Rajasingham et al in combination with the other randomised trials, provides suggestive evidence…
RT @joex92_: Les essais randomisés en prophylaxie montrent que HCQ marche aussi en prophylaxie (post ou pre-exposition) https://t.co/8odtAj…
Les essais randomisés en prophylaxie montrent que HCQ marche aussi en prophylaxie (post ou pre-exposition) https://t.co/8odtAjh4zo Cette observation est cohérente avec l'efficacité de HCQ en traitement précoce et renforce notre confiance que ça fonctionne
RT @MORUBKK: Interesting: New results from Rajasingham et al in combination with the other randomised trials, provides suggestive evidence…
Interesting: New results from Rajasingham et al in combination with the other randomised trials, provides suggestive evidence that #hydroxychloroquine may have a prophylactic effect ie may prevent #COVID19
@trump_israel @llrmiller @GiffinAmes @TwitterMoments @NEJM @zev_dr This randomized trial did not demonstrate a significant benefit of hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis for Covid-19. #FactCheck https://t.co/e1zvNIjdZH
@guyteissier @IHU_Marseille Pour info: https://t.co/IhDpm9NBxB https://t.co/lfEhEIkCW1 https://t.co/ZmloOq0ONp https://t.co/8QAKMUxYMY https://t.co/ljMJJzcXYo https://t.co/0IlA1yf94w Impossible de trouver une étude en double aveugle qui dise le contraire.
I wonder what prophylaxis people are talking about... People should follow IATF protocols on mass gatherings. Don't let our guard down #COVID19PH https://t.co/mJyTZkWEno
@Tipuncho Le seul article que j’ai trouvé sur l’usage prophylactique est le suivant et l’appellation de “prophylactique” y est mensongère. Il n’y a pas eu utilisation de zinc. Merci quand même pour l’info sur l’utilité d’un anti-inflammatoire corticostéroï
@xaxitabian1 @TimSmithMP @Health_Workers This Newsweek article refers to an opinion paper in AJE, not a RCT. There are however numerous RCTs on HCT in postexposure prophylaxis https://t.co/lsYJR3mmGQ mild disease https://t.co/mC8GBcfsxG and on mild to mod
@GarryJosephLit2 @TrumperWavin Hydroxychloroquine does not benefit COVID-19 patients based on double-blind randomized clinical trials: https://t.co/zXdzeHbbN9 , https://t.co/U3l6Vm4Uff , https://t.co/EwT9mzsNBG
@DrSerdarBasbug yani randomized trial larda placebo yok mu şimdi ? https://t.co/rqgDQkKcBT https://t.co/OnbnTaz590
@Davidasmor94 @Michelserre41 1. https://t.co/DMFzgkgumm 2. https://t.co/0Rl8owUWkS Mais j'en ai vu passer d'autres.
@NewtInMotion @gatewaypundit @grannyguns1 Your insults imply you have weak arguments. It's very easy to read the abstracts actually. Here are a few randomized double-blind, placebo controlled studies that have found HCQ ineffective. The best kinds of st
@theTwinsel @Tony____G @OlifaNT 88 retrospectieve studies met ieder grove fouten in de studie opzet. Hoe vaak denk jij, dat ik dit flauwekul staatje nu al gezien heb? Gelukkig is er wel een goede dubbelblinde gerandomiseerde studie. https://t.co/wnuFCRVhdK
@GeorgeS21302455 @grannyguns1 @gatewaypundit All the double blind studies have shown HCQ to be not very effective. Here are five of them. https://t.co/iH6IUYGN0f https://t.co/z53FjjbAcJ https://t.co/jTikRpWmpF https://t.co/fenUvN3dYj https://t.co/8ReS
@SeraFilson @PresiFernando @smithxweasley @whatchalooking @sciam https://t.co/H5ykTwIkUs I'll let the New England Journal of Medicine do the snark for me. Thanks. Science is a bitch, ain't it? Trump's a fucking moron.
@kew_howl @ianbremmer Whether politicians accept something is utterly irrelevant. In fact, most of it is being pushed by politicians. At this point, the evidence is that HCQ does not work as a prophylactic or as a treatment, and randomized studies show tha
@criley @spycedtx @Lollylulubes @KitterleCathy @juliaioffe That’s not a double blind or randomized trial, and it was too early. Here is just one of many actual scientific studies proving it ineffective. https://t.co/7F0niwr4NG
@EmSee36 Judy was discredited in 2011 for falsified data and theft. https://t.co/hfZhKJJrsj HCQ is ineffective against COVID-19 based on double-blind randomized clinical trials: https://t.co/zXdzeHbbN9 , https://t.co/U3l6Vm4Uff , https://t.co/EwT9mzsNBG. S
@Stebbing_Heuer @Mattas09 @SkyNewsAust @CraigKellyMP Since you hadn't seen that written anywhere I'll leave the studies that hold more weight. https://t.co/NsKSGdRkpB https://t.co/RXe0AxGB5e https://t.co/2yzgHxnNKD https://t.co/85QOSZdp0X https://t.co
@Auderesan @DesheShai @seranki @laurahelmuth @sciam Hydroxychloroquine trials failed spectacularly. After achieving no statistically significant improvement, the trials noted significant incidence of side effects. https://t.co/6wT7nMJ4j0
@Covid19Crusher @BaileInis HCQ does NOT WORK early later at all https://t.co/u6Kiml0xzm
@jangajentaan 1000 observationele studies bij elkaar kunnen niet in de schaduw staan van een correct uitgevoerde dubbelblinde studie. https://t.co/wnuFCRVhdK
@rietvandon Op geen enkele wijze is bewezen dat "early treatment" #LongCovid voorkomt. Evenmin is bewezen dat "early treatment" besmetting met Covid voorkomt. Dat is in een goede dubbelblinde studie bewezen. https://t.co/wnuFCRVhdK
@cgarrett101 Unfortunately, that finding didn't hold up with double blind studies. Of course, I'm no expert and I'd be happy to be wrong. I'm just so glad that we found so many cheaper alternatives to bring mortality rates down https://t.co/Pkd6PT8PZA
@LeftiesN @CaliforniaJax @DarlaTheDarling @u0106793 @robbystarbuck @sciam https://t.co/azmMO8nOBG https://t.co/i31V5m4AOV https://t.co/QYUmAmY7vK These include actual trials and studies involving data that is RECENT that show that it DOES. NOT. WORK.
Our mythbuster is based on this scientific research: “A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19.” New England Journal of Medicine 383, no. 6 (August 6, 2020): 517–25. https://t.co/dqDjWZ4B8A #scicomm #research
Sobre aquele tal site que lista os estudos que "comprovam" a eficácia da hidroxicloroquina
@filipe_rafaeli @anterolf @Samuka86420447 @otavio_ranzani Esse site é um embuste. Por ex., eles tratam o importante randomized trial publicado no NEJM (https://t.co/p9edtvXi8q) como sendo favorável, quando ele aponta para evidências negativas. https://t.co
@dennydorko @DarwinsGame9 @MSNBC "Taking a medicine that has multiple harmful side effects is a health risk." this has been debunked in the multiple control tests that have been done. Very few side effects. https://t.co/wD97MFQj2g.
@JenkinsRace @realDonaldTrump Nor does it prevent COVID. "After high-risk or moderate-risk exposure to Covid-19, hydroxychloroquine did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or confirmed infection when used as postexposure prophylaxis within 4 days
@spencerstang @mcfunny @bcbiochemist @DocEvenhouse You'll need to cite your claims. What specific RCTs "over-dosed" patients? Wouldn't you see that in the effect estimate? What is the range of doses for HCQ? The Boulware study examined early treatment in a
@trabreee @walt_whittaker @RichardGrenell @GovSisolak It’s not proven to be effective as a prophylaxis either https://t.co/OefIjpgdhp
@spencerstang @mcfunny @bcbiochemist @DocEvenhouse There was not a 50% reduction in hospitalization in the Boulware trial. The groups were relatively equal and there was one hospitalization in each group. https://t.co/LXZCdw7vfM https://t.co/XW6mtzXKd4
@drfyl @Concern09017991 @richardursomd Judy and RFK Jr. are both charlatans with no background in public health or vaccine science. She never found murine retroviruses in vaccines, which are never developed in mouse cell lines. https://t.co/knwyUmCCn1, ht
@belac46 @eugenegu @realDonaldTrump I prefer randomized trials as opposed to anecdotes https://t.co/WcNo86xEBX
@Idig_scars @KimMangone @kylegriffin1 https://t.co/H5ykTwIkUs I raise you a double-blind, randomized trial from NEJM. You lose, again. Shall we continue this fun game? I'm enjoying it!
@knnovick @Beth01957388 @drsimonegold Double-blind RCT studies show that HCQ is ineffective against COVID-19: https://t.co/LhNc1YsEAq, https://t.co/knwyUmCCn1, https://t.co/PKXw0fz7gt
@seymore77048582 @stillgray Take it from this medical researcher, hydroxychloroquine has been laid to rest as a “cure” for COVID. But if you don’t trust me, try the definitive clinical trial published in the most prestigious medical journal in the country.
@JustADudePlayi1 @mcupps @murray_nyc @JoeBiden Because it’s not proven to discernibly help against COVID-19 https://t.co/h54rTN05Jz
@Quirkythinker1 @annak3333 @RepAndyBiggsAZ @realDonaldTrump FDA has withdrawn use for Covid. https://t.co/2sJ7hOTifw
You actively pushed the hydroxychloroquine cure, despite evidence of that not being true? https://t.co/wxBwvFqM2E https://t.co/TOZ71fF1Hw
@yardana @razamit @yair_kraus מחקר של 821 חולים, פורסם באחד מהעיתונים הנחשבים בעולם. לא ראו אפקט של הטיפול הזה. זה לא עובד. https://t.co/V0xgsBdUYz
@melzintune @lfoxy23 @SteveSisolak Ok just saying Trump pumps the drug up so much pretty sure his followers believe it is going to work and likely have to be bat chit crazy Q. But if you want to look at real data I have a study below. Clue it doesn't work.
@Bud_dey @Cybren @GreyRider6 @TeamPelosi Here’s another one https://t.co/iHBqtuFm41
@SamyBensmida @QuentinChaine @raoult_didier RCT Voir ici : https://t.co/7O5AxZO9Rp
@debjp27 @RepAndyBiggsAZ There have been 4-5 randomized, placebo-controlled trial that has found it doesn't work, and if anything, makes it worse. See, for ex., the dbl-blind, RCT trial (AKA, the gold standard of trials) linked below. Research. You shou
@ellymelly Every randomised trial (where 1 group is given the drug being tested & control group is given placebo, ie sugar tablet) of HydroxyChloroquine has shown that it’s no more effective @ treating Covid19 than placebo. Non-randomised trials are un
@Ian56789 Every randomised trial (where 1 group is given the drug being tested & control group is given placebo, ie sugar tablet) of HydroxyChloroquine has shown that it is no more effective @ treating Covid19 than placebo https://t.co/IAS0GRK2b6
@margmopp Every single randomised trial (where 1 group are given drug being tested & control group are given placebo (sugar tablet) of HydroxyChloroquine has shown it is no more effective @ treating Covid19 than placebo https://t.co/IAS0GRK2b6
@GrumpyOLSoldier A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19 | NEJM https://t.co/IAS0GRK2b6
@lauren_a_when @PeterNavarro45 @CNN There is no need to wait for the peer-reviewed, RCT, gold standard trials. They have already been published. No 'multiple other countries' have used it with success. What other countries have that we don't is leaders tha
RT @crabb_vicki: @hbhbglenn1 @mcfunny @DanWilson_PhD @henri1746 @RazzZinger Choosing low-quality evidence over high-quality evidence demons…
@hbhbglenn1 @mcfunny @DanWilson_PhD @henri1746 @RazzZinger Choosing low-quality evidence over high-quality evidence demonstrates cherry-picking. I’m referring to RCTs. https://t.co/LXZCdw7vfM
@hbhbglenn1 @DanWilson_PhD @henri1746 @RazzZinger no, it is an anonymously produced list of studies with inaccurate descriptions. it is intended to deceive. HCQ is not better than standard of prophylactically or as a treatment. the Frontline Doctors are f
@hbhbglenn1 @DanWilson_PhD @henri1746 @RazzZinger a small number of good quality studies supersedes many low quality studies. some of the retrospective studies were suggestive, but the RCTs to date show no benefit. for example https://t.co/aQi1R2YL0J
@hbhbglenn1 @DanWilson_PhD @henri1746 @RazzZinger I am not out of the loop by a long shot. RCTs to date show no effect beyond standard of care https://t.co/aQi1R2Ha9b
@Linda36758099 @realDonaldTrump Hydroxychloroquine does not benefit COVID-19 patients based on results of double-blind randomized clinical trials: https://t.co/zXdzeHbbN9 , https://t.co/U3l6Vm4Uff , https://t.co/EwT9mzsNBG
RT @DavidJuurlink: After exposure to SARS-CoV-2, hydroxychloroquine doesn't significantly lower the risk of infection https://t.co/9Wh7OGbm…
@JaclynHord And early treatment has been carried out. #Hydroxychloroquine doesn't work for #COVID19 https://t.co/3SHqp50mH0 , https://t.co/nYIue31AAu , https://t.co/oZq8QO8Qd5 , https://t.co/CbexaaAMh8
@raoult_didier HCQ (+ trucs) n'est pas un ttt contre le covid ! C'est maintenant bien établit. Cf. par exemple : https://t.co/7O5AxZO9Rp https://t.co/joyHPhjVQc https://t.co/DnG3NoJVUQ ( https://t.co/UI0ECWiGgV ) https://t.co/ZpmFQbA2JT https://t.co
@jl_proulx C’est des double blind? Je vais aller lire... Les dernières études sur la chloroquine ne montraient aucune efficacité... https://t.co/3UDz9PE0JQ