↓ Skip to main content

Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 5,901)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
11751 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages
reddit
6 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial
Published in
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica G.Y. Luc, Michael A. Archer, Rakesh C. Arora, Edward M. Bender, Arie Blitz, David T. Cooke, Tamara Ni Hlci, Biniam Kidane, Maral Ouzounian, Thomas K. Varghese, Mara B. Antonoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11,751 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#224
of 15,638,780 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 5,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69
of 287,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,638,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.