You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica G Y Luc, Michael A Archer, Rakesh C Arora, Edward M Bender, Arie Blitz, David T Cooke, Tamara Ni Hlci, Biniam Kidane, Maral Ouzounian, Thomas K Varghese, Mara B Antonoff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10,035 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2245 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 773 | 8% |
| Australia | 374 | 4% |
| Canada | 345 | 3% |
| Spain | 312 | 3% |
| Germany | 275 | 3% |
| France | 203 | 2% |
| Japan | 141 | 1% |
| Brazil | 138 | 1% |
| Other | 1640 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3589 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5866 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3334 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 518 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 313 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 195 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 23% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 31% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4293. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,075
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 8,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90
of 434,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.