↓ Skip to main content

Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 35,356)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis
Published in
The Lancet, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31324-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandeep R Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka, Amit N Patel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50,877 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 17 9%
Unspecified 16 8%
Other 79 40%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 33%
Unspecified 20 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 9%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 34 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24439. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8
of 16,094,294 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2
of 35,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2
of 292,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.