↓ Skip to main content

Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 37,958)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
349 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis
Published in
The Lancet, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31324-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandeep R Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka, Amit N Patel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36,690 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Master 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Other 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 87 31%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 66 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19625. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#29
of 19,581,278 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#7
of 37,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 301,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#4
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,581,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.