RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
@plloover @wotwitwotwotwow @andrew_croxford @talkRADIO @JuliaHB1 How about these studies
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
@ClareCraigPath There is little doubt that lockdowns can work, evidence below. However, it may well be true that chaotic policy now makes them marginally ineffective in the UK. 1-https://t.co/IaQNSXg58o 2-https://t.co/JMXf4DU6z2 3-https://t.co/SOc2XXUEyc
@Keith040856 @DrDomPimenta Got any evidence to go with that opinion? Because there's mountains of evidence that lockdowns work. https://t.co/7Q9g5dJWZK
@ProfRieck @buuure87 @braveNewMike @hwin365 @sneakerdaddy93 @SHomburg @CherryCartier @GeskeWohler Was ist mit all den Studien, die die Wirksamkeit von Lockdowns belegen? Die wollen Sie dann doch auch nicht als unglaubwürdig abtun, oder? Hier eine Liste vo
@ADiagrams @Davej0hnson0k @Lyndonx @BorisJohnson @MattHancock @CMO_England Other than the fact the data shows R falls therefore cases fall therefore deaths fall https://t.co/WQkc8ZdIYV
@MonkmanFrances @Lyndonx @BorisJohnson @MattHancock @CMO_England I have. Stop posting nonsense. It drives the R down and saves lives. https://t.co/WQkc8ZvjQt
@Steely927 @ClareCraigPath I don't have a time machine, so will have to settle with showing this graph and a nice tweet of papers demonstrating that point https://t.co/OyY2TNHd3s https://t.co/ykU6Ljf3zb
@GeorgeZero6 @alisonkatebr @deeokelly1 It's certainly true that you can have a pandemic without excess deaths. But the COVID pandemic is characterised by a significant excess in deaths. Also lockdowns work: https://t.co/c6EYHcFJwM
@DavidTratch @randyhillier @Roman_Baber @fordnation Lockdowns work. Masks work. https://t.co/j0tiwBpgVD https://t.co/McnBOjr5vB You lost your job because you were lied to, and you believed it.
@ClaudiaMishell5 @drmikehart Peer-reviewed scientific papers disagree with you. https://t.co/McnBOjr5vB
@TuxedoBunnie @ianmdallas @pedwards_phil @FatEmperor @Tangrantum @cjsnowdon You’re welcome. Plus you might want to look at countries like New Zealand and Australia etc
@Sarahbsharpe @FatEmperor You’re welcome
@Sabrina96966140 @FatEmperor Despite the irrefutable basic fact that reduced social mixing will reduce transmission of an airborne virus... Here's a start https://t.co/fJXjFjONFy
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
@lizzyroz @cjsnowdon @FatEmperor @hughosmond It is not simplistic. One would have to be in advanced state of denial not to believe that lockdowns suppress the virus and cause cases to fall. The vast majority of experts and academia support that. https://t
@FatEmperor Hi Ivor, have a read of these
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
@ChrisGr29264921 @FatEmperor Here you go: https://t.co/vpMZ3ZtSJ4
RT @JimTimberthing: Here @fatemeperor Here are some studies that support lockdown to add to your files, you know, as being a man of scienc…
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
RT @JimTimberthing: Here @fatemeperor Here are some studies that support lockdown to add to your files, you know, as being a man of scienc…
RT @JimTimberthing: Here @fatemeperor Here are some studies that support lockdown to add to your files, you know, as being a man of scienc…
@randyhillier Actually, anybody with half a brain can see that if people are not out spreading the virus, it won't spread magically by itself. This conclusion is also backed up by peer-reviewed studies. https://t.co/McnBOjr5vB
@Caio1135355256 @mellziland @GTMacalossi Segue o estudo abaixo, caso queria amplia seu conhecimento sobre medidas não farmacológicas. https://t.co/MbCsM1ghiX
@Caio1135355256 @mellziland @GTMacalossi Segue o estudo abaixo, caso queria amplia seu conhecimento sobre medidas não farmacológicas. https://t.co/MbCsM1ghiX
@PanData19 @the_brumby And here are some more: https://t.co/ZMRo2Q4Cjh
@TsioutisC OTOH, I find JPAI's paper thoughtful indeed (https://t.co/kJ2iYhL2EF). What you & others point out (a kind of confounding by indication) applies equally to all similar research (like this:https://t.co/cOvBh38toP). One can't invoke this onl
@desgren @DrNeilStone @alanmcn1 Or you could look at the evidence. Here are over 13 studies that show lockdowns work; https://t.co/MnaJ0BkvHb
@zaninmoreira @UOL Mais artigo científico, publicado em agosto. Sobre os efeitos das políticas anti-contágio. Abs!! https://t.co/Y3g3iEOsul
@zaninmoreira @UOL Prezado, Segue mais um para você ler quem sabe não a crescente algo de novo no seu conhecimento. Onde eu posso ler esses 80 artigos científicos? https://t.co/MbCsM1ghiX
@fewizi @StreuliRoland @pptcomics @Yannik51769489 @SHomburg @luebberding @destatis Es gibt genauso Studien, die die Wirksamkeit der NPI bestätigen🤷🏻! https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@Rconstantino @Biakicis Complementando 5. https://t.co/WY19PwtgtA 6. https://t.co/SS7dndvd5y 7. https://t.co/J16jzgFbR5 8. https://t.co/IAeooBRNZd 9. https://t.co/YkzF4VCVrp
@AndreasShrugged @GidMK Fully agreed. But even genuinely sensible people (probably knowingly) published this with the same mistake in Nature a few months back: https://t.co/X6HuOmX6v9
RT @jvmald: @jasonptodd @tesoureiros Complementando: 1. https://t.co/4FTNz2nDwN 2. https://t.co/WW0nMujPtY 3. https://t.co/1l1cMWWTYj 4…
@PilarAndres14 @tesoureiros https://t.co/EZE7NbU0nS E essa lista, Pilar, te convence? A importância do lockdown está estabelecida desde março, e não o fazemos, por burrice. Há estudos de novembro (https://t.co/ATgtm1MGsM) que comprovam a mesma coisa des
@mp3michael I do not have the time to individually cite all the papers that show support for non-pharmaceutical interventions. As I said, the jury is out on net gains/losses. But the fact that Sweden is now rolling out a more aggressive approach is indica
@plattenjunkieDE @die_vom "Erste und einzige"... https://t.co/TM04W9D8ql
@MackerelMc @EssexPR @DPJHodges @JuliaHB1 And? I have studies showing they LD's work. They drive down the R and save lives. Here you go: https://t.co/ZMRo2Q4Cjh
@the_brumby You forgot a lot of studies that SHOW effectiveness of #NPI😁! Wouldn't this complete the picture? #corona https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@NoHumbugScience @HRichbern @SHomburg Gibt auch genug Studien, die die Wirksamkeit zeigen! https://t.co/MLz4mU5OAU
@John38934556 @MarkMun52583445 @randyhillier You haven't read the scientific literature. https://t.co/McnBOjr5vB
@ssbawa @randyhillier There are lots of papers saying there are measurable benefits. Stop spreading misinformation. For example https://t.co/McnBOjr5vB
@WhereIsJGaltNow @naomirwolf @randyhillier @jeffreyatucker You haven't read the peer-reviewed literature, silly person. Here's another. https://t.co/McnBOjr5vB
@racechikee @BritainFree If you look at the data, the R number reduces. Tis very clear to see. Oh and this: https://t.co/ZMRo2Q4Cjh
@MichaelYeadon3 @DrAseemMalhotra You haven't seen any? I can help. Here are over 13 studies; https://t.co/MnaJ0BkvHb
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
@Emily_Burns_V Re: "no relationship btw LDs & spread". The relationship btw LDs & ⬇️ spread is well-documented. https://t.co/FznkSpqn3Y https://t.co/oZjS5rlo4O https://t.co/1Ng8pLXdzT https://t.co/E3EvTD583k https://t.co/IgOurgQ0Qo https://t.co/
@FatEmperor @c_johnstone1980 Re: "I can't find credible papers from the other side" I found some! https://t.co/FznkSpqn3Y https://t.co/oZjS5rlo4O https://t.co/1Ng8pLXdzT https://t.co/E3EvTD583k https://t.co/IgOurgQ0Qo https://t.co/ZdKjLAXPt3 https://t.co/
@timothy_millar @rosielillie7 @FatEmperor Sweden are in a bad way right now, having to cancel paediatric surgery again and cancer screening just as they did with the first spike and lockdowns DO work but should only be a last resort when TTI wasn’t impleme
@MarkatLangstone @FatEmperor Please don't use Ivor Ivor Cummings as support. He has proved to be wrong almost every step of the way in this pandemic and doesn't even have the grace to admit it. Almost all papers support Lockdowns do work. See below https
@matonolo @AquilesBaezaV11 @masckine @AXELKAISER Hay varios, no ha que ir muy lejos para saber que las cuarentenas funcionan. Pero dejo algunos de los primeros, cada vez hay más con resultados similares. https://t.co/djqiDufug1 https://t.co/jLBInDmQLL
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
@MaggieW82391432 @StevenW44446801 @robhocking5 @partyof76 @Fletchey2 @guardian LD' work. They drive down the R and save lives. https://t.co/WQkc8ZdIYV
Da kann ich helfen! https://t.co/VtWnmZ6cIZ https://t.co/zwkUPC6iVx https://t.co/xglgxgRcNg
@betahorse @StopCoronavir12 @MichaelYeadon3 LD's work. They drive down the R and save lives: https://t.co/ZMRo2Q4Cjh
@PaulPesachGray @randyhillier @JoyHataley Here, a little help for you to understand. https://t.co/McnBOjr5vB
@Gigi91307496 @DrPanMD And MANY studies that lockdowns work. https://t.co/uaPSM7905e
@silverbug85 @Timotei365 @V1NN0F @DrDomPimenta 1/ Yes, lockdowns are effective. https://t.co/c6EYHcFJwM
@VanSophia @MarkChangizi @jhaskinscabrera @jack @boriquagato @FatEmperor Bzzt. Wrong. 26 conspiracy Youtube videos or rubbish preprints. Real, published and peer-reviewed studies say otherwise: https://t.co/NgtzwCB4jT
@Quillspiller @randyhillier Your source claims to be "non-partisan". But a TRULY non-partisan group would cite the peer-reviewed research that argues just the opposite: that interventions like lockdowns are effective. And there are lots. For example
@ClarkeMicah @bhbunny_ben Here you go: https://t.co/ZMRo2Q4Cjh
@dianehackney11 @stjohnambulance @FatEmperor 2. Lockdowns work. https://t.co/c6EYHcFJwM
@dgurdasani1 And you’ve ignored studies suggesting no effect of school closures on community transmission: https://t.co/eN052rGnYO https://t.co/Tuv7RGbYvM https://t.co/f6RwDNuhsY Which have their limitations too. But this isn’t as straightforward as ju
@HIThomasFranke @Dlf_Forschung Aber die Datenlage verbessert sich stetig, z.B. https://t.co/7NaF26smwU oder https://t.co/skQUkWPnHP
@El_Duderino_788 @timspector See below a small sample of studies that show lockdowns reduce spread and save lives. The issue is what happens when they are listed and now we have vaccine lockdown for UK becomes a no brainer. https://t.co/sdvrTu2HYq
@HollyParr20 @doubtinthomas82 @Peradventur3 @NinjaThyroid @chrischirp @MichaelYeadon3 And there is oodles of research on the efficacy of different NPIs and lockdown. Not sure why you are asking for it though? Your will just continue to ignore the balance
RT @zorinaq: Lockdowns work. Nearly all studies suggest that is the case: 1-https://t.co/0J4tjK8IVJ 2-https://t.co/CfCBzEFEj0 3-https://t…
@studio_me @dj__error @InCytometry @orwellhamster @cjsnowdon If you really want to consider IC as unreliable, here’s another study by the University of California. https://t.co/FxlYktuaIS
@ArakhLeopald @rolandbest @Karl_Lauterbach Ja, aber es sind „nur“ 35k wegen der Maßnahmen. Ohne Maßnahmen bei einer kompletten durchseuchung wären wir jetzt bei mehr als 1 Millionen Toten. Bis Mai wurden dadurch bereits 500k tote verhindert: https://t.co/E
RT @DocRichard: Hsiang et al June 2020 "Policy packages that were deployed to reduce the rate of transmission achieved large, beneficial an…
Hsiang et al June 2020 "Policy packages that were deployed to reduce the rate of transmission achieved large, beneficial and measurable health outcomes" https://t.co/Ko8l6bFGu9 7/