↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 76,364)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
560 Mendeley
Title
Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
Published in
Nature, June 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth Flaxman, Swapnil Mishra, Axel Gandy, H. Juliette T. Unwin, Thomas A. Mellan, Helen Coupland, Charles Whittaker, Harrison Zhu, Tresnia Berah, Jeffrey W. Eaton, Mélodie Monod, Azra C. Ghani, Christl A. Donnelly, Steven Riley, Michaela A. C. Vollmer, Neil M. Ferguson, Lucy C. Okell, Samir Bhatt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,813 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 560 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 560 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 103 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 14%
Student > Master 56 10%
Student > Bachelor 55 10%
Other 40 7%
Other 138 25%
Unknown 91 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 6%
Mathematics 30 5%
Social Sciences 27 5%
Other 191 34%
Unknown 125 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5696. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#230
of 16,094,294 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#23
of 76,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60
of 292,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#3
of 775 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 87.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 775 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.