| Title |
Mortality rates of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the emerging literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03006-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pipetius Quah, Andrew Li, Jason Phua |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 14% |
| Chile | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 73% |
| Scientists | 7 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 263 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 73 | 28% |
| Unknown | 63 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 78 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#939,569
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#708
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,228
of 435,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#34
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.