↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for fluid management of adults with sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for fluid management of adults with sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of guidelines
Published in
Critical Care, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-02978-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Silberberg, Stephen Aston, Selda Boztepe, Shevin Jacob, Jamie Rylance

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,170,388
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,974
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,674
of 433,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#114
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.