↓ Skip to main content

ECMO use in COVID-19: lessons from past respiratory virus outbreaks—a narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
ECMO use in COVID-19: lessons from past respiratory virus outbreaks—a narrative review
Published in
Critical Care, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-02979-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hwa Jin Cho, Silver Heinsar, In Seok Jeong, Kiran Shekar, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Jae Seung Jung, Jacky Y. Suen, John F. Fraser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Librarian 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 22 28%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Unspecified 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#469,781
of 16,250,537 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#363
of 5,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,308
of 290,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,250,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them