| Title |
The origin and underlying driving forces of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-020-00665-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu-Miaw Chaw, Jui-Hung Tai, Shi-Lun Chen, Chia-Hung Hsieh, Sui-Yuan Chang, Shiou-Hwei Yeh, Wei-Shiung Yang, Pei-Jer Chen, Hurng-Yi Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 23% |
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Botswana | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 22% |
| Unknown | 52 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 21% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#262,172
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#14
of 1,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,657
of 434,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.