You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An application of upscaled optimal foraging theory using hidden Markov modelling: year-round behavioural variation in a large arctic herbivore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Movement Ecology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40462-020-00213-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Larissa T. Beumer, Jennifer Pohle, Niels M. Schmidt, Marianna Chimienti, Jean-Pierre Desforges, Lars H. Hansen, Roland Langrock, Stine Højlund Pedersen, Mikkel Stelvig, Floris M. van Beest |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Denmark | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,755,983
of 24,733,536 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#78
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,227
of 402,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,733,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.