↓ Skip to main content

From COVID-19 research to vaccine application: why might it take 17 months not 17 years and what are the wider lessons?

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,315)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
From COVID-19 research to vaccine application: why might it take 17 months not 17 years and what are the wider lessons?
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12961-020-00571-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen R. Hanney, Steven Wooding, Jon Sussex, Jonathan Grant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 71 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Engineering 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 78 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#151,227
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 1,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,142
of 402,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.