↓ Skip to main content

(Bio)ética e Atenção Primária à Saúde: estudo preliminar nas Clínicas da Família no município do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(Bio)ética e Atenção Primária à Saúde: estudo preliminar nas Clínicas da Família no município do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015215.00332015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keith Bullia da Fonseca Simas, Patrícia Passos Simões, Andréia Patrícia Gomes, Aline do Amaral Zils Costa, Claudia Gomes Pereira, Rodrigo Siqueira-Batista

Abstract

The Family Health Strategy (FHS) started out as the Family Health Program (FHP) in 1994, and has since has been re-thought and re-worked in Brazil as the primary rationale for reorganizing Primary Healthcare (PHC). Transforming the hegemonic PHC into FHS has resulted in many changes in how healthcare is provided, which have impacted different areas. For example, matters of (bio)ethics must still be elucidated. Within this context, this investigation is characterized as an exploratory study focused on mapping the main (bio)ethical problems identified by PHC workers in the city of Rio de Janeiro. For this reason, we used a questionnaire and asked Family Clinic (FC) healthcare professionals to answer it. The answers were submitted to content analysis as proposed by Bardin. PHC in the context of Family Clinics has unique elements in terms of the (bio)ethical relationships established in this level of healthcare. It is extremely necessary that new theoretical references be proposed, and that education/training measures to address such issues be developed.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Philosophy 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#11,151,894
of 12,536,156 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#487
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,160
of 264,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,536,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.