You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The costs of soil erosion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-06832011000200001 |
| Authors |
Tiago Santos Telles, Maria de Fátima Guimarães, Sonia Carmela Falci Dechen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#42
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,545
of 122,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them