You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brief cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care: a hybrid type 2 patient-randomized effectiveness-implementation design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey A Cully, Maria E A Armento, Juliette Mott, Michael R Nadorff, Aanand D Naik, Melinda A Stanley, Kristen H Sorocco, Mark E Kunik, Nancy J Petersen, Michael R Kauth |
| Abstract |
Despite the availability of evidence-based psychotherapies for depression and anxiety, they are underused in non-mental health specialty settings such as primary care. Hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs have the potential to evaluate clinical and implementation outcomes of evidence-based psychotherapies to improve their translation into routine clinical care practices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 33% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 255 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 65 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2012.
All research outputs
#6,149,877
of 24,330,613 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,018
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,840
of 167,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,330,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.