↓ Skip to main content

Spatial accuracy assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle-based structures from motion multi-view stereo photogrammetry for geomorphic observations in initiation zones of debris flows, Ohya landslide…

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial accuracy assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle-based structures from motion multi-view stereo photogrammetry for geomorphic observations in initiation zones of debris flows, Ohya landslide, Japan
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40645-020-00336-0
Authors

Haruka Tsunetaka, Norifumi Hotta, Yuichi S. Hayakawa, Fumitoshi Imaizumi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 33%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,153,187
of 15,886,926 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#77
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,509
of 291,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,886,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them