↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of 3D Printing Methods and Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of 3D Printing Methods and Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage
Published in
Advanced Materials, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/adma.202000556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vladimir Egorov, Umair Gulzar, Yan Zhang, Siobhán Breen, Colm O'Dwyer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 27 20%
Materials Science 21 15%
Chemistry 17 13%
Chemical Engineering 8 6%
Energy 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 48 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,261,837
of 17,939,930 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#4,916
of 12,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,423
of 296,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#88
of 349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,939,930 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.