↓ Skip to main content

Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000230.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mori, Rintaro, Ota, Erika, Middleton, Philippa, Tobe-Gai, Ruoyan, Mahomed, Kassam, Bhutta, Zulfiqar A

Abstract

It has been suggested that low serum zinc levels may be associated with suboptimal outcomes of pregnancy such as prolonged labour, atonic postpartum haemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm labour and post-term pregnancies, although many of these associations have not yet been established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Peru 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
New Zealand 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 63 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 8 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2012.
All research outputs
#6,135,035
of 8,078,137 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,140
of 8,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,829
of 94,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,078,137 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.