You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator
Science, June 2020
Edward J. Gregr, Villy Christensen, Linda Nichol, Rebecca G. Martone, Russell W. Markel, Jane C. Watson, Christopher D. G. Harley, Evgeny A. Pakhomov, Jonathan B. Shurin, Kai M. A. Chan
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||100||79%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||4||3%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||42||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||41||14%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||39||13%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||72||24%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||10||3%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||8||3%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||7||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 620. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,884,310 outputs
Outputs from Science
of 80,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 404,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
of 964 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,884,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 964 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.