↓ Skip to main content

Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
53 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
138 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator
Published in
Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.aay5342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward J. Gregr, Villy Christensen, Linda Nichol, Rebecca G. Martone, Russell W. Markel, Jane C. Watson, Christopher D. G. Harley, Evgeny A. Pakhomov, Jonathan B. Shurin, Kai M. A. Chan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 240 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Professor 16 7%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 79 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 53 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 536. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#31,656
of 21,047,241 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,497
of 76,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,421
of 304,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#86
of 962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,047,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.