↓ Skip to main content

Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
103 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator
Published in
Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.aay5342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward J. Gregr, Villy Christensen, Linda Nichol, Rebecca G. Martone, Russell W. Markel, Jane C. Watson, Christopher D. G. Harley, Evgeny A. Pakhomov, Jonathan B. Shurin, Kai M. A. Chan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Professor 9 6%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 61 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 25 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 499. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#25,871
of 16,897,606 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,362
of 69,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,442
of 292,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#88
of 945 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,897,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 945 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.