↓ Skip to main content

Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
102 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator
Published in
Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.aay5342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward J. Gregr, Villy Christensen, Linda Nichol, Rebecca G. Martone, Russell W. Markel, Jane C. Watson, Christopher D. G. Harley, Evgeny A. Pakhomov, Jonathan B. Shurin, Kai M. A. Chan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Professor 11 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 66 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 29 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 497. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#27,809
of 17,648,139 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,436
of 70,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,490
of 294,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#90
of 951 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,648,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 951 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.