↓ Skip to main content

Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
51 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
104 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator
Published in
Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.aay5342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward J. Gregr, Villy Christensen, Linda Nichol, Rebecca G. Martone, Russell W. Markel, Jane C. Watson, Christopher D. G. Harley, Evgeny A. Pakhomov, Jonathan B. Shurin, Kai M. A. Chan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 7 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 54 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 20 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 496. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2020.
All research outputs
#24,917
of 16,300,435 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,317
of 68,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,408
of 290,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#89
of 949 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,300,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 949 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.