↓ Skip to main content

Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
116 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Cascading social-ecological costs and benefits triggered by a recovering keystone predator
Published in
Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.aay5342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward J. Gregr, Villy Christensen, Linda Nichol, Rebecca G. Martone, Russell W. Markel, Jane C. Watson, Christopher D. G. Harley, Evgeny A. Pakhomov, Jonathan B. Shurin, Kai M. A. Chan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 479. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#24,197
of 15,636,652 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,279
of 67,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,475
of 286,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#96
of 943 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,636,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 943 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.