| Title |
Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2009637117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renyi Zhang, Yixin Li, Annie L. Zhang, Yuan Wang, Mario J. Molina |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28,396 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4637 | 16% |
| Mexico | 2789 | 10% |
| Spain | 953 | 3% |
| Japan | 727 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 712 | 3% |
| Canada | 576 | 2% |
| France | 388 | 1% |
| India | 333 | 1% |
| Germany | 331 | 1% |
| Other | 2890 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14060 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25423 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1680 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 749 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 525 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,526 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1526 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 211 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 176 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 147 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 143 | 9% |
| Other | 108 | 7% |
| Other | 325 | 21% |
| Unknown | 416 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 231 | 15% |
| Engineering | 122 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 90 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 64 | 4% |
| Other | 442 | 29% |
| Unknown | 496 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19654. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#34
of 24,527,525 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3
of 101,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 402,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2
of 1,065 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,065 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.