↓ Skip to main content

New Imaging Findings of Incomplete Partition Type III Inner Ear Malformation and Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Imaging Findings of Incomplete Partition Type III Inner Ear Malformation and Literature Review
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, May 2020
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a6576
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Hong, Q. Du, Y. Pan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,066,076
of 15,542,315 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#128
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,623
of 280,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#7
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,542,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.